Deterrence or Normalization: The Relationship Between Murder Rates and Sentencing Severity in Russia’s Regions

Authors

  • S. Y. Amsharinskaya Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики» Автор

Keywords:

deterrence theory, crime rate, certainty, severity, sentencing, factors of law enforcement decision-making

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between homicide rates and the severity of judicial sentences across Russian regions. Deterrence theory posits that in areas with high crime rates, judges are likely to impose harsher punishments to increase the expected costs of criminal activity and thereby reduce its prevalence. However, social and psychological factors may induce a normalization effect, resulting in no significant change in average sentencing lengths. To ascertain which mechanism predominates in the Russian context, a two-stage regression analysis was employed. The first stage involved a multilevel regression analysis of sentencing data under Part 1 of Article 105 of the Russian Criminal Code (homicide) for the period from 2013 to 2019 (N = 20,265). The findings indicate that judges tend to assign stricter penalties in regions with higher homicide rates, consistent with the deterrence hypothesis. However, intraregional comparisons revealed that within a given region, increases in homicide rates were associated with harsher sentences only for repeat offenders. The second stage aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of this sentencing strategy through a regression analysis aggregated at the regional level (N = 448). The results demonstrated that neither the severity of punishment nor the crime clearance rate had a statistically significant impact on subsequent homicide levels in the regions. These findings call into question the efficacy of using sentence severity as a tool to reduce violent crime.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Андриенко Ю. В. (2001) В поисках объяснения роста преступности в России в переходный период: криминометрический подход. Higher School of Economics Economic Journal, 5, рр. 194‒220. EDN: SLUWMK

Волченко О. В., Широканова А. А. (2016) Применение многоуровневого регрессионного моделирования к межстрановым данным (на примере генерализованного доверия). Социология: методология, методы, математическое моделирование (Социология: 4М), 43, с. 7–62. EDN: ZDEEIP

Abramovaite J., Bandyopadhyay S., Bhattacharya S., Cowen N. (2023) Classical deterrence theory revisited: An empirical analysis of Police Force Areas in England and Wales. European Journal of Criminology, 20(5), рр. 1663–1680. doi: 10.1177/14773708211072415

Andrienko Y., Shelley L. (2005) Crime, Violence, and Political Conflict in Russia (Understanding civil war, рр. 87–118). World Bank; JSTOR. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep02484.8

Becker G. S. (1968) Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), рр. 169–217. doi: 10.1086/259394

Bun M. J. G., Kelaher R., Sarafidis V., Weatherburn D. (2020) Crime, deterrence and punishment revisited. Empirical Economics, 59(5), рр. 2303–2333. doi: 10.1007/s00181-019-01758-6

Chalfin A., McCrary J. (2017) Criminal Deterrence : A Review of the Literature. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(1), рр. 5–48. doi: 10.1257/jel.20141147

Chervyakov V. V., Shkolnikov V. M., Pridemore W. A., McKee M. (2002) The changing nature of murder in Russia. Social Science & Medicine, 55(10), рр. 1713–1724. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00299-4

Cooney M., Burt C. H. (2008) Less Crime, More Punishment. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), рр. 491–527. doi: 10.1086/592425

Drago F., Galbiati R., Vertova P. (2009) The Deterrent Effects of Prison: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. Journal of Political Economy, 117(2), рр. 257–280. doi: 10.1086/599286

Ehrlich I. (1973) Participation in Illegitimate Activities: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), рр. 521–565. doi: 10.1086/260058

Engelen P.-J., Lander M. W., Van Essen M. (2016) What determines crime rates? An empirical test of integrated economic and sociological theories of criminal behavior. The Social Science Journal, 53(2), рр. 247–262. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2015.09.001

Fragkouli K., Boumba V., Vougiouklakis T. (2016) Survey of medico-legal investigation of homicide in the region of Epirus (Northwest Greece). Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 37, рр. 39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.10.003

Goodwin G. P., Gromet D. M. (2014) Punishment. WIREs Cognitive Science, 5(5), рр. 561–572. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1301

Grogger J. (1991) Certainty vs. Severity of punishment. Economic Inquiry, 29(2), рр. 297–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1991.tb01272.x

Hayward K. (2007) Situational Crime Prevention and its Discontents: Rational Choice Theory versus the “Culture of Now”. Social Policy & Administration, 41(3), рр. 232–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00550.x

Hendley K. (2009) “Telephone Law” and the “Rule of Law”: The Russian Case. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 1(02), рр. 241. doi: 10.1017/S1876404509002413

Heyes A., Saberian S. (2019) Temperature and Decisions: Evidence from 207,000 Court Cases. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(2), рр. 238–265. doi: 10.1257/app.20170223

Hou Y., Wang P. (2020) Unpolluted decisions: Air quality and judicial outcomes in China. Economics Letters, 194, рр. 109‒369. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109369

Lochner L. (2007) Individual Perceptions of the Criminal Justice System. The American Economic Review, 97(1), рр. 444–460. doi: 10.1257/000282807780323505

Loeffler C. E., Nagin D. S. (2022) The Impact of Incarceration on Recidivism. Annual Review of Criminology, 5(1), рр. 133–152. doi: 10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-112506

Lysova, A. V., Shchitov N. G., Pridemore W. A. (2012) Homicide in Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus. В: M. C. A. Liem & W. A. Pridemore (Ред.), Handbook of European Homicide Research (рр. 451–469). Springer New York. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-0466-8_29

Meade B., Steiner B., Makarios M., Travis L. (2013) Estimating a Dose–Response Relationship Between Time Served in Prison and Recidivism. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50(4), рр. 525–550. doi: 10.1177/0022427812458928

Mrug S., Madan A., Cook E. W., Wright R. A. (2015) Emotional and Physiological Desensitization to Real-Life and Movie Violence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(5), рр. 1092–1108. doi: 10.1007/s10964-014-0202-z

Nagin D. S., Cullen F. T., Jonson C. L. (2009) Imprisonment and Reoffending. Crime and Justice, 38(1), рр. 115–200. doi: 10.1086/599202

Peer E., Gamliel E. (2013) Heuristics and biases in judicial decisions. Court Review, 49, р. 114.

Prudkov P. N., Rodina O. N. (2019) Cold temperatures, stress, and violence. Heliyon, 5(5), рр. e01619. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01619

Rhodes W., Gaes G. G., Kling R., Cutler C. (2018) Relationship Between Prison Length of Stay and Recidivism: A Study Using Regression Discontinuity and Instrumental Variables With Multiple Break Points. Criminology & Public Policy, 17(3), рр. 731–769. doi: 10.1111/1745-9133.12382

Tittle C. R. (1969) Crime Rates and Legal Sanctions. Social Problems, 16(4), рр. 409–423. doi: 10.2307/799950

Wermink H., Nieuwbeerta P., Ramakers A. A. T., De Keijser J. W., Dirkzwager A. J. E. (2018) Short-Term Effects of Imprisonment Length on Recidivism in the Netherlands. Crime & Delinquency, 64(8), рр. 1057–1093. doi: 10.1177/0011128716687290

Wheeler S., Mann K., Sarat A. (1980) Sentencing the White-Collar Offender. American Criminal Law Review, 17.

Wilson J. Q., Herrnstein R. J. (1986) Crime and human nature: The definitive study of the causes of crime (1. Touchstone ed). Simon und Schuster.

Zhuchkova S., Kazun A. (2023) Exploring Gender Bias in Homicide Sentencing: An Empirical Study of Russian Court Decisions Using Text Mining. Homicide Studies, рр. 10887679231217159. doi: 10.1177/10887679231217159

Downloads

Published

2025-04-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Amsharinskaya S.Y. Deterrence or Normalization: The Relationship Between Murder Rates and Sentencing Severity in Russia’s Regions // Sociology of Power. 2025. Vol. 37, no. 4. P. 51–76.