Two understandings of everyday life in frame analysis and James''s assumption about solving contradictories
Keywords:
frame analysis, Erving Goffman, everyday life, William JamesAbstract
There are two contradictory understandings of everyday life in Erving Goffman’s frame analysis. According to the first, reality of everyday life is paramount and other worlds are only its transformations. In another understanding everyday life is one of many realities with equal status, it also can be considered as a result of other worlds transformations. Current paper provides historico-theoretical analysis of roots of this contradiction, an attempt to solve it is also made.Downloads
References
Бейтсон Г. Теория игры и фантазии //Экология разума. Избр. статьи по антропологии, психиатрии и эпистемологии. М.: Смысл, 2000. С. 205-220.
Вахштайн В. Социология повседневности и теория фреймов. СПб.: Изд-во Европейского университета, 2011.
Гофман И. Анализ фреймов: эссе об организации повседневного опыта. М.: Институт социологии РАН, 2003.
Латур Б. Об интеробъективности //Социологическое обозрение. 2007. Т. 6. № 2. С. 79-96.
Шюц А. О множественности реальностей // Социологическое обозрение. 2003. Т. 3. №2. С. 3-34.
Hazerligg L. Reading Goffman's Framing as Provocation of a Discipline //Erving Goffman/G. Fine, G. Smith (eds.). Vol. III. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE, 2000, р. 137-160.
James W. The Psychology of Belief//Mind. 1889. Vol. XIV. № 55. P. 321-352.
James W. The Perception of Reality //Principles of Psychology. N. Y.: Henry Colt and Company, 1905, p. 283-324.
MacKenzie D. Is Economics Performative? Option Theory and the Construction of Derivatives Markets // MacKenzie D. Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics/F. Muniesa, L. Siu (eds.). New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 2007, p. 54-86.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN SIWAQZ
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)
