My body is my fortress: public opinion on biomedical technologies
Keywords:
bioethics, biomedicine, sociology of the body, mass surveyAbstract
The article has two focal points. The first is understanding of «body tum» in the social sciences in the context of biomedical technologies' development. During the XX century numerous social transformations, often called biomedicalization of society, actualized body issues for sociology. At the same time these conditions of actualization are poorly articulated and little known to researchers. Hence the first objective of this work - to show how the topic of biomedical technologies associates with sociology. According to this the article deals with significant events and changes in the field of medicine and genetics, and describes their impact on the various public institutions. The second focus of the article is the empirical one. It involves the study of social attitudes among the Russians regarding the use of biomedical technologies in everyday life. ISSEK mass survey allowed us to define the extent to which modern technological innovation can be perceived by people as part of their daily practices. Survey results demonstrate population's cautious attitude to biomedical technologies, with a positive attitude to the technological advancements and IT-technologies. It suggests that invasive technologies concerning body modification through biomedical technologies have a special status in the public consciousness. The study of this feature is an important direction for future studies dedicated to the problems of bioethics.Downloads
References
Иванюшкин А. Я. (2004) От этики Гиппократа к биоэтике. Медицинское право и этика, (1).
Куракин Д. Ю. (2011) Модели тела в современном популярном и экспертном дискурсе: к культурсоциологической перспективе анализа. Социологическое обозрение, 10 (1-2): 56-74.
Силуянова И. В. (2011) Биоэтика в России: ценности и законы, М.: Грантъ.
Тернер Б. (1994) Современные направления развития теории тела. THESIS, (6): 137-167.
Фуко М. (1997) История безумия в классическую эпоху, СПб: Университетская книга.
Фуко М. (2004) Ненормальные: курс лекций, прочитанных в Колледж де Франс в 1974-1975 учебном году, СПб: Наука.
Bauer M. (1998) The medicalization of science news-from the «rocket-scalpel» to the «gene-meteorite» complex. Social Science Information, 37 (4): 731-751.
Butler J. (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of «sex», London; N. Y.: 1993.
Clark A. E., Shim J. K., Mamo L., Fosket J. R., Fishman J. R. (2003) Biomedicalization: Technoscientific Transformations of Health, Illness, and U. S. Biomedicine. American Sociological Review, (68): 161-194.
Clarke A. E. (1995) Modernity, Postmodernity, and Reproductive Processes ca. 1890-1990 or, Mommy, Where Do Cyborgs Come From Anyway? C. H. Gray, H. J. Figueroa-Sarriera, S. Mentor (eds) The Cyborg Handbook. N. Y.: Routledge: 139-155.
Conrad P., Potter D. (2000) From Hyperactive Children to ADHD Adults: Observations on the Expansion of Medical Categories. Social Problems, (47): 559-82.
Conrad P. (1992) Medicalization and Social Control. Annual Review of Sociology, (18): 209-232.
Cook A. J., Kerr G. N., Moore K. (2002) Attitudes and intentions towards purchasing GM food. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23 (5): 557-572.
Critchley Ch. R. (2008) Public opinion and trust in scientists: the role of the research context, and the perceived motivation of stem cell researchers. Public Understanding of science, (17): 309-327.
Durant J., Evans G., Thomas G. (1992) Public understanding of science in Britain: the role of medicine in the popular representation of science. Public Understanding of science, 1 (2): 161-182.
Evans J. H. (2012) The History and Future of Bioethics: A Sociological View, N. Y.: Oxford University Press.
Fujimura J. H. (1999) The Practices and Politics of Producing Meaning in the Human Genome Project. Sociology of Science Yearbook, 21 (1): 49-87.
Haraway D. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, N. Y.: Routledge.
Kleinman D. L., Kloppenburg J. Jr. (1991) Aiming for the Discursive High Ground: Monsanto and the Biotechnology Controversy. Sociological Forum, 6 (3): 427-447.
Liu H., Priest S. (2009) Understanding public support for stem cell research: media communication, interpersonal communication and trust in key actors. Public Understanding of science, 18 (6): 704-718.
Nisbet M. C., Goidel R. K. (2007) Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: bridging the ethnographic survey research divide. Public Understanding of science, (16): 421-440.
Polyakova V. (2013) The Social Legitimation of Biomedical Technologies in Russia: Communication Challenges for Science and Society. Working papers by NRU HSE. Series «Science, Technology, Innovation».
Shilling, C. (1993) The Body and Social Theory. London, Newbury Park, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Schneider J. W. (1978) Deviant drinking as a disease: deviant drinking as a social accomplishment. Social Problems, (25): 361-372.
Turner B. (2006) Body. Theory, Culture & Society, 23 (2-3): 223-229.
Turner B. (1996) The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Waskul D., Vannini Ph. (2006) Introduction: The Body in Symbolic Interaction. Waskul D., Vannini Ph. (eds) Body/Embodiment. Symbolic Interaction and the Sociology of the Body. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited: 1-18.
Weingart P., Salzmann C., Wörmann S. (2008) The social embedding of biomedicine: an analysis of German media debates 1995-2004. Public Understanding of science, (17): 381-396.
Zola I. K. (1972) Medicine as an Institution of Social Control. The Sociological Review, 20 (4): 487-504.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN VVHOLP
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)