Semper in motu: Marxism and ''Old Mole'' methaphor
Keywords:
MetaPhore, specters, marxism, teleology, revolution, ideology, tragedy, farceAbstract
The following article examines the metaphor of the "mole" which passed through the history of philosophy of Modernity. This metaphor gained special significance in the Marxist intellectual tradition where it was often identified with revolutionary teleology and inevitability of the birth of a new society from the inherent contradictions of the old one. However, the idea of the "mole" as an internal, "underground" realization of this law of history was explained through its incompatibility with the self-representation of the given epoch, and those classes and individuals acting within it. The very figure of the "mole" - from Shakespeare to Marx - referred to the idea of anachronistic displacement of time, violation of the linear connection between the past and the present, able to give birth to the "specters" and constantly remind us of the incompleteness of the present moment. The metaphor of the "mole" became the "metaphor of the metaphor", that is a figure representing a shift from the sphere of thought to the sphere of appearances, as well as directly dealing with the materialization, the realization of thought as such. If for Hegel the metaphor of the mole represents thought seeking the truth, for Marx it represents revolution that "does its work methodically", while for Herzen "historical movement that can't be stopped", and for Bataille the matter that confronts the illusionary domination of the spirit, then in our times the mole could be identified with Marxism itself. This tradition exists in between the mobilizing idea and material circumstances, theory and practice, and appears in history each time as a kind of specter that requires recognition. The author, starting from the most well known uses of this metaphor (in Shakespeare's "Hamlet" and Marx's "Eighteenth Brumaire") examines its transformation in Marxist and Post-Marxist thought.Downloads
References
Альтюссер Л. (2006) За Маркса, М.: Праксис: 127-187.
Античная басня. (1991) Пер. М. Гаспарова. М.: Художественная литература.
Арендт Х. (2013) Жизнь ума, СПб.: Наука.
Арендт Х. (2014) Между прошлым и будущим. Восемь упражнений в политической мысли, М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара.
Бенсаид Д. (2009) Большевизм и XXI еек, М.: Свободное марксистское издательство.
Беньямин В. (2012) Учение о подобии. М.: РГГУ.
Блох Э. (1991) Принцип надежды. Утопия и утопическое мышление: антология зарубежной литературы. М.: Прогресс: 49-79.
Гегель Г.В.Ф. (1999) Лекции по истории философии Кн.3, СПб.: Наука.
Гегель Г.В. Ф. (1968) Эстетика. В 4 т. Т. 1. М. Лифшиц (ред.), М.: Искусство.
Гегель Г.В. Ф. (1969) Эстетика. В 4 т. Т. 2. М. Лифшиц (ред.), М.: Искусство.
Герцен А.И. (1955) Собр. соч. е 30 т. Т. 6, М.: Изд-во АН СССР.
Делез Ж. (2001) Ницше, Спб.: Axioma.
Делез Ж. (2004) Переговоры, 1972-1990, СПб.: Наука: 226-233.
Деррида Ж. (2006) Призраки Маркса. Государство долга, работа скорби и новый Интернационал, М.: Logos-Altera.
Идрис Шах (1994) Суфизм, М.: Клышников, Комаров и Ко.
Келли А. (2001) Герцен против Шопенгауэра: ответ пессимизму. НЛО, (49).
Колетти Л. Бернштейн и марксизм II Интернационала (http://openleft.ru/?p=6775)
Ленин В.И. (1986) Избр. соч. в 10 т. Т. 7, М.: Политиздат.
Мандель Э. (2013) Марксистская теория империализма и ее критики (http://www.redflora.org/2013/05/blog-post_23.html)
Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. (1984) Избр. соч. в 9 т. Т. 1, 4, М.: Политиздат.
Маркс К., Энгельс (1958) Собр. соч. Т.12, М.: Политиздат.
Мейнеке Ф. (2013) Возникновение историзма, СПб.: Центр гуманитарных инициатив.
Sociology of Power Vol. 28 № 2 (2016)
Негри А., Хардт М. (2004) Империя, М.: Праксис.
Уайт Х. (2002) Метаистория: Историческое воображение в Европе XIX века, Екатеринбург: Изд-во Уральск. ун-та.
Уитмен У. (1954) Избранное, М.: Художественная литература: 185-186.
Хабермас Ю. (2003) Философский дискурс о модерне, М.: Весь Мир.
Шекспир В. (1936) Трагедия о Гамлете, принце Датском. Собр. соч. в 8 т. Т. 5, М.; Л.: Academia.
Шмитт К. (2007) Теория партизана, М.: Праксис.
Bataille G. (2008) The Old Mole and Prefix Sur. Visions of Excess. Selected Writings 19271939, Univercity of Minnesota Press: 33-44.
Gramsci A. (2000) The Gramsci Reader. Selected Writings 1916-1935, N.Y.: New York Univercity Press: 32-36.
De Grazia M. (1999) Teleology, Delay and the «Old Mole». Shakespeare Quarterly, 50 (3): 251-267.
Harvey D. (2003) New Imperialism, N.Y.: Oxford Press.
Harrie M. (1995) Homo Alludens: Marx's Eighteenth Brumaire, New German Critique. Special Issue on the Nineteenth Century, (66): 35-64.
Krell D.F. (1981) The Mole: philosophic Burrowings in Kant, Hegel, and Nietzsche: boundary 2, Vol. 9/10, Vol. 9, no. 3 - Vol. 10, no. 1, Why Nietzsche Now? A Boundary 2 Symposium, Duke University Press.: 169-185
Lukacher N. (1986) Primal Scenes, Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press.
Luxemburg R. (1972) Selected political writings (Writings of the Left), N.Y.: Random House.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN WFRXZR
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)