Preposterous History: anachronistic Middle Ages at the turn of the XX-XXI centuries

Authors

  • Evgenii Savitskii Институт всеобщей истории РАН , Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences , РГГУ , Russian State University for the Humanities Автор

Keywords:

anachronism, medievalism, historiography, temporalities

Abstract

The article deals with the place of anachronisms in the debates about how medieval history should be studied in the late XX and early XXI cent. As an example were taken works of American historians known as new medievalists, and in particular two aspects discussed there: rethinking the notion of alterity, which is related to the definition of something as queer and especially as preposterous. In this last notion are related in a very particular way the meanings of a temporal (absence of) order, of unnaturalness, of disturbing hierarchies, absurdity, monstruosity, folly, madness. So the question of a wrong temporal order, of anachronism, through this notion is related to a range of other issues, which are of importance for historical and theoretical research at the turn of the XX-XXI cent. In the article the understanding of alterity by the new medievalists is related to a broader context of the earlier discussions about the specific character of the Middle Ages as an epoch and about the possibility of anachronisms in historical writing -from a desire no annihilate the anachronisms completely in the professional historiography of the XIX and early XX century up to their partial legitimation in the new cultural history of the 1970s, especially under the influence of works by J. Le Goff. But, as is here argued, despite all the importance of the influences from the third generation of the «Annales» school, which reproduces the old opposition between reality and representations, new medievalists are doing something different, questioning and historicizing the opposition itself, and doing it not only with the Middle Ages, but also our contemporary historical culture in view. A special attention is given in these researches to the political connotations of historicism and anachronism, to the different regimes of historicity. As a conclusion will be discussed again the notion «preposterous» and the relevance of its rhetorical connotations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Савицкий Е.Е. (2015) «Новый медиевализм» четверть века спустя. Новое литературное обозрение. 135: 346-354.

Biddick K. (2001) Translating the Foreskin. Burger G., Kruger S.F. (eds) Queering the Middle Ages, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press: 193-212.

Bloch R.H. (2003) The Anonymous Marie de France, London, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Borgolte M. (2001) Vor dem Ende der Nationalgeschichten? Chancen und Hindernisse für eine Geschichte Europas im Mittelalter. Historische Zeitschrift, 272: 561-596.

Borgolte M. (2004) Kulturelle Einheit und religiöse Differenz: Zur Verbreitung der Polygynie im mittelalterlichen Europa. Zeitschrift für historische Forschung, 31 (1): 1-36.

Burger G., Kruger S.F. (eds) (2001) Queering the Middle Ages, Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.

Camille M. (1977) Mirror in Parchment: The Luttrell Psalter and the Making of Medieval England, London, Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Cohen J.J. (2000) The Postcolonial Middle Ages, N.Y.: Palgrave.

Escudier A., Sauzay B., Thadden R. von. (eds) (2001) Gedenken im Zwiespalt. Konfliktlinien europäischen Erinnerns, Göttingen: Wallstein.

Freedman P., Spiegel G.M. (1998) Medievalisms Old and New: The Rediscovery of Alterity in North American Medieval Studies. American Historical Review, 103 (3): 677-704.

Goez W. (2000) Kirchenreform und Investiturstreit, 910-1122, Stuttgart, Berlin, Köln: Kohlhammer.

Preposterous History: анахроничное Средневековье на рубеже XX-XXI веков

Hartog F. (2003) Régimes d'historicité: Présentisme et expériences du temps, Paris: Seuil.

Kelly J. (1984) Women, History and Theory, London; Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Kordecki L. (2011) Ecofeminist Subjectivities: Chaucer's Talking Birds, N.Y.: Palgrave.

Le Goff J. (1985) L'histoire politique est-elle toujours l'épine dorsale de l'histoire? Idem. L'imaginaire médiéval, Paris: Gallimard: 333-349.

Le Goff J. (2003) L'Europe est-elle née au Moyen Age? Paris: Seuil.

Martin J.-C. (1997) Pour une histoire «principielle» de l'Europe. Vingtième siècle: Revue d'histoire, 53: 124-128.

Mitterauer M. (2004) Warum Europa? Mittelalterliche Grundlagen eines Sonderwegs. 3.

Aufl. München: C.H. Beck.

Revel J. L'homme des "Annales"? Schmitt J.-C. (eds) L'Ogre historien: Autour de Jacques le Goff Paris: Gallimard, p. 33-54.

Rioux J.-P. (1996) Pour une histoire de l'Europe sans adjectif. Vingtième siècle: Revue d'histoire, 50: 101-110.

Rosemann P.W. (1999) Understanding Scholastic Thought with Foucault, N.Y.: Palgrave.

Ruthven K.K. (2004) Preposterous Chatterton. English Literary History, 71 (2): 345-375.

Scala E., Federico S. (eds) (2009) The Post-Historical Middle Ages, N.Y.: Palgrave.

Schmitt J.-C. (1998) Le seminaire. Revel J., Schmitt J.-C. (eds) L'Ogre historien: Autour de Jacques le Goff. Paris: Gallimard, p. 17-32.

Skinner P. (2003) Confronting the «Medieval» in Medieval History: The Jewish Example. Past and Present. 181: 219-247.

Smith J.M.H. (2000) Did Women Have a Transformation of the Roman World? Gender and History, 12: 552-571.

Stock B. (1990) Listening for the Text: On the Uses of the Past, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Weisl A.J. (2003) The Persistence of Medievalism: Narrative Adventures in Contemporary Culture, N.Y.: Palgrave.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Savitskii E. Preposterous History: anachronistic Middle Ages at the turn of the XX-XXI centuries // Sociology of Power. 2016. Vol. 28, no. 2. P. 62–77.

Коды статьи

  • EDN WFRYAB
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)