Object Sees the Subject: Political Anthropology of Sociological Fieldwork

Authors

  • Greg Borisovich Yudin Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики» , Higher School of Economics Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2016-4-57-82

Keywords:

POLITICAL anthropology, field situation, ethnography, public opinion, state

Abstract

Anthropological critique of the scientific subject has discovered the political premises of the fieldwork situation for the social sciences. Among the essential parameters of the situation is the object's view of the fieldwork communication: how does object perceive and interpret the subject? Although this issue is crucial for understanding the nature of the field data, sociology seldom attempts such reflexive critique. This paper relies on the data gathered during a series of sociological studies of Russian small towns to reveal the key features of sociological field situation. We argue that field interaction is always already inscribed into particular political relations and structures. More specifically, we demonstrate that informants are likely to adopt a bottom-up view in the interaction with the researcher and frame it as a communication with the state. We discuss main parameters and scenarios enacted by this type of communication and show how it is supplemented by various tactics of 'slipping away' aiming to resist the state apparatus of social-scientific knowledge. We emphasize the significance of political-anthropological refection of fieldwork communication for proper interpretation of sociological data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Бурдье П. (2011) Включенная объективация. Социологический журнал, (5): 21-38

Гирц К. (2004) Глубокая игра: заметки о петушиных боях у балийцев. Интерпретация культур, М.: РОССПЭН: 390-429

Гоулднер Э. (2003) Наступающий кризис западной социологии, М.: Наука

Грэбер Д. (2014) Фрагменты анархистской антропологии, М.: Радикальная теория и практика

Докторов Б. (2005) Первопроходцы мира мнений: от Гэллапа до Грушина, М.: Фонд «Общественное мнение»

Докторов Б. (2006) Отцы-основатели: история изучения общественного мнения, М.: Центр социального прогнозирования

Зиммель Г. (2008) Экскурс о чужаке. А. Филиппов (ред.) Социологическая теория: история, современность, перспективы, СПб.: Владимир Даль: 9-14

Малиновский Б. (2004) Аргонавты Западной части Тихого океана, М.: РОССПЭН

Отношения антрополога и изучаемого сообщества (2016). Антропологический форум, (30): 7-80

Рогозин Д., Картавцев В., Галиева Н., Вьюговская Е. (2016) Методический аудит массового опроса, М.: Дело

Фирсов Б. (2012) История советской социологии: 1950-1980-е годы. Очерки, СПб: Издательство Европейского университета

Эванс-Притчард Э. (1985) Нуэры, М.: Наука

Asad T. (1973) Two European Images of Non-European Rule. T. Asad (ed.) Anthropology and the Colonial Encounter, London: Ithaca Press: 103-120

Blalock H.M., Jr. (1969) Theory Construction: From Verbal to Mathematical Formulations, NJ: Prentice Hall

Firth R. (1989) Introduction, Second Introduction. B. Malinowski. A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term, Stanford: Stanford University Press: xi-xxxii

Fortes M., Evans-Pritchard E. (1947) African Political Systems, London; New York; Toronto: Oxford University Press

Foucault M. (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interview and Other Writings, N.Y.: Pantheon Books

Foucault M. (2010) Archaeology of Knowledge, N.Y.: Vintage Books

Geertz C. (1967) Under the Mosquito Net. New York Review of Books, September 14

Gupta A. (1995) Blurred boundaries: the discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. American Ethnologist, 22 (2): 375-402

Haraway D. (1988) Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14 (3): 575-599

Leiris M. (1969) L'ethnographie devant le colonialisme. Cinq études d'ethnologie. Le racisme et le Tiers-Monde, Paris: Denoël Gonthier

Manyoni J. (1983) Eager Visitor, Reluctant Host: The Anthropologist as Stranger

Anthropologica, New Series, 25 (2): 221-249

Marcus G. (1986) Afterword: Ethnographic Writing and Anthropological Careers

G. Marcus, J. Clifford (eds) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press: 262-266

Marcus G., Fischer M. (1999). Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

Ortner S. (2006) Anthropology and Social Theory: Culture, Power, and the Acting Subject, Durham; London: Duke University Press

Pels D. (1999) Privileged Nomads: On the Strangeness of Intellectuals and the Intellectuality of Strangers. Theory, Culture & Society, 16 (1): 63-86

Rabinow P. (1977) Reflections on Fieldwork in Morocco, Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press

Rabinow P., Marcus G., Faubion J. (2008) Designs for an Anthropology of the Contemporary, Durham; London: Duke University Press

Rosaldo R. (1986) From the Door of His Tent: The Fieldworker and the Inquisitor

G. Marcus, J. Clifford (eds.) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press: 77-97

Rosaldo R. (1993) Culture & Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis, Boston: Beacon Press

Scholte B. (1971) Discontents in Anthropology. Social Research, 38 (4): 777-807

Scholte B. (1972) Toward a Reflexive and Critical Anthropology. D. Hymes (ed.) Reinventing Anthropology, N.Y.: Pantheon Books: 430-457

Stoler A.L. (1995) Race and the Education of Desire: Foucault's History of Sexuality and the Colonial Order of Things, Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press

Юдин Г.Б. (2016) Субъект глазами объекта: политическая антропология полевой социологии. Социология власти, 28 (4): 57-82

Скотт Дж. (2005) Благими намерениями государства, М.: Университетская книга

Ссорин-Чайков Н. (2011) От изобретения традиции к этнографии государства: Подкаменная Тунгуска, 1920-е годы. Журнал исследований социальной политики, 9 (1): 7-44

Филиппов А. (2014) Советская социология как полицейская наука. Политическая концептология, (3): 91-105

Bourdieu P. (1988) Homo Academicus, Stanford: Stanford University Press

Crapanzano V. (1985) Tuhami: Portrait of a Moroccan, Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press

Dwyer K. (1987) Moroccan dialogues: Anthropology in question, Long Grove: Waveland Press

Fabian J. (2014) Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object, N.Y.: Columbia University Press

Gupta A., Ferguson J. (eds) (1997) Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science, Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press

Habermas J. (1972) Knowledge and Human Interests, Boston: Beacon Press

Knorr-Cetina K. (2013) The Manufacture of Knowledge, Oxford: Pergamon Press

Kuklick H. (2011) Personal Equations: Reflections on the History of Fieldwork, with Special Reference to Sociocultural Anthropology. Isis, 102 (1): 1-33

Downloads

Published

2016-07-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yudin G.B. Object Sees the Subject: Political Anthropology of Sociological Fieldwork // Sociology of Power. 2016. Vol. 28, no. 4. P. 57–82. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2016-4-57-82

Коды статьи

  • EDN XIQDIB
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)