Death Care Industry in Modern Russia: Breakdown of Infrastructure As Power Resource

Authors

  • Sergei Viktorovich Mokhov Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики» , Higher School of Economics Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2016-4-83-103

Keywords:

death care industry, funerals, funeral market, anthropology of infrastructure, cemeteries

Abstract

Russian death care industry is quite different from the European and American model. There are no any big national funeral corporations in Russia, no any private funeral homes or private mortuaries and cemeteries. All of the death care 84 industry infrastructure is owned by the government. The infrastructure is the source for illegal and criminal practices. Why illegal and criminal practices and bad technical conditions do not meet the government counter? May we say that it is the status quo? One possible way to answer on this question may be the analysis of the infrastructure. In this paper I am going to present: how the funeral infrastructure creates social and power relations between local government and funeral homes; the role of technical condition of infrastructure in the process of power control. I argue that the status quo, which is understood as the controlled infrastructure breakdown, intentionally supported by different actors. Repairs and maintenance of infrastructure is a form of political control between local government and business. The principal feature of the death care industry in Russia is a specific mechanism of controlling the powerful infrastructure environment. The impact on her condition is a special form of flexible political control when breaking infrastructure and its repair is a compromise between government and private funeral agencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Абелев М., Рожков С., Зульфугарзаде Т. (2006) Похоронное дело в России. Заместитель главного врача, (4): 137-140

Моисеева Е.Н. (2013) Твоя последняя покупка, выбранная кем-то другим. Экономическая социология, 1 (14): 13-22

Филиппова С.В. (2009) Кладбище как символическое пространство социальной стратификации. Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, 12 (4): 80-96

Callon M., Caliskan K. (2005) New and Old Directions in the Anthropology of Markets, N.Y.: Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research

Hillary A., Hentschel C. (2015) Interactions with infrastructure as windows into social worlds: A method for critical urban studies. City, 19 (2-3): 306-312

Höhne S. (2015) The Birth of the Urban Passenger: Infrastructural Subjectivity and the Opening of the New York City Subway. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 19 (2-3): 313-321

Goody J. (1974) Death and the Interpretation of Culture: A Bibliographic Overview. American Quarterly, Special Issue: Death in America, 26 (5)

Graham S., Thrift N. (2007) Out of Order: Understanding Repair and Maintenance. Theory, Culture and Society, 24 (3): 1-25

Fligstein N. (1996). Markets as Politics: A Political Cultural Approach to Market Institutions. American Social Review, (61): 656-673

Harvey P., Knox H. (2015) Roads: An Anthropology of Infrastructure and Expertise, Cornell University Press

Hertz R. (1960) Death and the Right Hand, Glencoe; Illinois: The Free Press

Jackson S., Pompe A., Krieshok G. (2012) "Repair Worlds: Maintenance, Repair, and ICT for Development in Rural Namibia". Proceedings of the 2012 Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Conference, Seattle, Washington

Laderman G. (2005) Rest in Peace. A Cultural History of Death and the Funeral Home in Twentieth-Century America, Oxford University Press

Latour B. (1999) Pandora's hope: essays on the reality of science studies, Cambridge: Harvard University Press

Parsons B. (1999) Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The lifecycle of the UK funeral industry. Mortality, 4 (2): 127-145

Smith R.G.E. (1996) The Death Care Industries in the United States, Jefferson, NC: McFarland

Simone A. (2004) People as Infrastructure: Intersecting Fragments in Johannesburg. Public Culture, (16): 407-429

Stone C.N. (1989) Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas

Stone C.N. (1993) Urban Regimes and the Capacity to Govern: A Political Economy Approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15 (1): 1-28

Trompette P. (2011) Political exchanges in the French funeral market. Management & Organizational History, (6): 13-35

Walter T. (2005) Three ways to arrange a funeral: Mortuary variation in the modern West. Mortality, 10 (3): 173-192

Мохов С.В. (2016) Рынок ритуальных услуг в современной России: поломка похоронной инфраструктуры как властный ресурс. Социология власти, 28 (4): 83-103

Грачев Р. (2012) Гражданско-правовое регулирование рынка ритуальных услуг. Автореф. дис.... канд. юрид. наук. (http://www.lawtech.ru/document/2012avtoref385)

Ледяев В. (2010) Изучение власти в городских сообществах: основные этапы и модели исследования. Неприкосновенный запас, 2 (70): 135-144

Downloads

Published

2016-07-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mokhov S.V. Death Care Industry in Modern Russia: Breakdown of Infrastructure As Power Resource // Sociology of Power. 2016. Vol. 28, no. 4. P. 83–103. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2016-4-83-103

Коды статьи

  • EDN XIQDIL
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)