Hybrid Architecture: Cyborg Ecology and Cosmopolitics of Urban Life

Authors

  • Nickolay I. Rudenko Социологический институт РАН , Institute of Sociology of the RAS Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2017-1-41-58

Keywords:

cyborg ecology, architecture, living organisms, Matthew Gandy, Mitchell Joachim

Abstract

In this article the "cyborg ecology" discourse is considered both in social sciences and in architecture and planning theory and practice. This city language appeared in the middle of 2000ths and was based on insights of actor-network theory, political ecology and assemblage theory. The conditions of its occurring are following: globalization, multiculturality of contemporary cities, an increasing of material and informational complexity in them as well as ecological agenda in city policies. Cyborg ecology as a discourse aims at the widening of repertoires of actors and including in this list entities of nature (living organisms, climate conditions, material objects). At the same time, this discourse overcomes modernist difference between nature and culture, and ignoring the view of cities as anti-natire. By reenacting the nature in city, it demonstrated complex networks of technologies (mainly, city infrastructures), politics and policies, culture (consumerists and medical discourses), and living organisms (human bodies, viruses, animals, plants), which creating temporal and flexible assemblages of biological life in cities. Cyborg metaphor by Matthew Gandy is widely disseminated also in architecture and planning theory and practice, and this process is illustrated by examples.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Агамбен Дж. (2011) Homo Sacer. Суверенная власть и голая жизнь, М.: Европа.

Вахштайн В.С. (2014) Пересборка города: между языком и пространством. Социология власти, (2): 9-38.

Латур Б. (2014) Пересборка социального. Введение в акторно-сетевую теорию, М.: ИД ВШЭ.

Энгельс Ф. (1955) Положение рабочего класса в Англии. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч. Т. 2, М.: Издательство политической литературы: 231-517.

Эко У. (2006) Отсутствующая структура. Введение в семиологию, СПб: Simposium. Andersson E. et al. (2014) Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services. Ambio, 43 (4): 445-453.

Cattermole P. (2013) Building for Tomorrow: Visionary Architecture from Around the World, London: Thames and Hudson Ltd.

Davis B. (2011) Mycorrhizal extrastructures, mycelial urbanisms. Kerb: Journal of Landscape Architecture, 19: 82-87.

Detroit's New «AgriHood» is the Future of Urban Planning (2016). (https://www. pastemagazine.com/articles/2017/01/detroits-new-agrihood-is-the-future-of-urban-plann.html)

Gabriel N. (2014) Urban political ecology: Environmental imaginary, governance, and the non-human. Geography Compass, 8 (1): 38-48.

Gandy M. (2002) Concrete and clay: Reworking nature in New York City, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gandy M. (2005) Cyborg urbanization: complexity and monstrosity in the contemporary city. International journal of urban and regional research, 29 (1): 26-49.

Gandy M. (2006a) The bacteriological city and its discontents. Historical geography, 34: 14-25.

Gandy M. (2006b) Zones of indistinction: bio-political contestations in the urban arena. Cultural geographies, 13 (4): 497-516.

Gandy M. (2013) El resurgir de Zoöpolis: biodiversidad, paisaje y ecologias cosmopolitas. Urban, (5): 9-14.

Gissen D. (2006) Thermopolis: Conceptualizing Environmental Technologies in the Urban Sphere. Journal of Architectural Education, 60 (1): 43-53.

Graham S., Marvin S. (2001) Splintering urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition, Psychology Press.

Graham, S., Crang, M. (2007) Sentient cities: ambient intelligence and the politics of urban space. Information. Communication and Society, (10): 789-817.

Haraway D. (2000) A cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. D. Bell, B.M. Kennedy (eds) The cybercultures reader, London; New York: Routledge: 291-325.

Joachim M. (2010) Don't build your home, grow it! (https://www.ted.com/talks/mitchell_ joachim_don_t_build_your_home_grow_it)Joachim M. (2016) Ten archetypes of nature in design. Technoetic Arts, 14 (1-2): 127-130.

Jacobs J.M. (2012) Urban geographies I. Still thinking cities relationally. Progress in Human Geography, 36 (3): 412-422.

Keil R., Ali H. (2006) Multiculturalism, racism and infectious disease in the global city: the experience of the 2003 SARS outbreak in Toronto. Topia: Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies, 16: 23-49.

Kuhlmann D. (2011) Biomorphism in Architecture: Speculations on Growth and Form. P. Gruber, D. Bruckner et al. (eds) Biomimetics Materials, Structures and Processes. Examples, Ideas and Case Studies, Berlin; New York: Springer: 149-178.

Latin America's cities sweat over health risks from urban heat (2017) (http://af.reuters.com/ article/energyOilNews/idAFL8N1FZ718).

Lieto L., Beauregard R.A. (eds) (2015) Planning for a material world, Routledge.

Mattern S. (2017) A City Is Not a Computer (https://placesjournal.org/article/a-city-is-not-a-computer)

Paris bans cars registered before year 2000 in bid to combat city pollution (2017). (http:// www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/paris-bans-vehicles-registerd-before-2000-fight-city-air-pollution-france-emission-reducing-a7542921.html)

Perkins H.A. (2007) Ecologies of actor-networks and (non) social labor within the urban political economies of nature. Geoforum, 38 (6): 1152-1162.

Sennett R. (1994) Stone and Flesh. The Body and the City in Western Civilization, London: Faber and Faber.

Sennett R. (2012) No one likes a city that's too smart. The Guardian, 4 December. (http:// www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/04/smart-city-rio-songdo-masdar) Swyngedouw E. Circulations and metabolisms:(hybrid) natures and (cyborg) cities. Science as Culture, 15 (2): 105-121.

Tironi M., Sanchez Criado T. (2015) Of Sensors and Sensitivities. Towards a Cosmopolitics of "Smart Cities"? TECNOSCIENZA. Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, (6): 89-108.

Urban theory lab (2014). Podcast 1: Matthew Gandy. (http://www.urbantheorylab.net/ podcast/podcast-1-matthew-gandy)

Vidler A. (1992) Homes for cyborgs: domestic prostheses from Salvador Dali to Diller and Scofidio. The architectural uncanny: Essays in the modern unhomely, MIT press:147-161.

Wolch J. (1996) Zoöpolis. Capitalism nature socialism, 7 (2): 21-47.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Rudenko N.I. Hybrid Architecture: Cyborg Ecology and Cosmopolitics of Urban Life // Sociology of Power. 2017. Vol. 29, no. 1. P. 41–58. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2017-1-41-58

Коды статьи

  • EDN YPKVRF
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)