On the Analysis Method of Materiality in Foucault’s Microphisics of Power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2017-4-55-67Keywords:
STs, ant, technology, Foucault, Latour, power, materiality, method, social explanationAbstract
The article is devoted to the method of materiality analysis formulated by Michel Foucault in the three courses taught at the Collège de France in the late 1970s. The rules of the method bring Foucault’s approach closer to research in science and technology and the actor-network theory. The mutual interest of STS and Fucoldianism is connected, on the one hand, with the weak conceptualization of power, and, on the other hand, with the understanding of power through technology. "After Foucault,” technology is understood either as a set of rules, or as a manifestation of the concepts of Fucoldianism. The materiality of technology remains beyond the attention of researchers. For the explication of the rules, it is proposed to return "back to Foucault” and clear the legacy of the French philosopher from transatlantic interpretations based on "social explanation”. The rules of the method set forth by the French philosopher in the courses create the following ontology of power. First, we are talking about the design, power is created by the actors, but at the same time can’t be appropriated once and for all; the possibilities of its creation and transfer are limited. Secondly, it is necessary to talk about the analysis of specific changing objects-subjects, and not about universals. Third, that the analyzed phenomena of power always have a local character, rooting in specific conditions of place and time. Fourth, Foucault emphasizes the multiplicity and discreteness of power. Finally, fifth, the contextuality and situational nature of power effects and relations is crucial. All this shows that, within the framework of his method of analyzing and understanding reality as a material, Michel Foucault is very close to research into science and technology (STS), in which reality is a multiple, heterogeneous and local construction created by actors from specific materials using tools that provide resistance at creation and after construction.Downloads
References
Дин М. (2016) Правительственность: власть и правление в современных обществах, М.: Издательский дом «Дело» РАНХиГС, 2016.
Донзло Ж., Гордон К. (2008) Управление либеральными обществами - эффект Фуко в англоязычном мире. Логос, 2: 3-20.
Жижек С. (2005) Интерпассивность, или Как наслаждаться посредством Другого. Жижек С. Интерпассивность. Желание: влечение. Мультикультурализм, СПб: Алетейя: 6-44.
Каллон М. (2015) Некоторые элементы социологии перевода: одомашнивание морских гребешков и рыбаков залива Сен-Бриё. Социология власти, 1: 196-231.
Латур Б. (2013) Наука в действии: следуя за учеными и инженерами внутри общества, СПб.: Изд-во ЕУ СПб
Латур Б. (2014) Пересборка социального: введение в акторно-сетевую теорию, М.: Изд. дом ВШЭ.
Латур Б. (2015) Пастер: война и мир микробов, с приложением «Несводимого», СПб: Изд-во ЕУ СПб.
Латур Б. (2017) Об акторно-сетевой теории. Некоторые разъяснения, дополненные еще большими усложнениями. Логос, 1: 173-200.
Ло Дж. (2015) После метода: беспорядок и социальная наука, М.: Институт Гайдара.
Сивков Д. (2014) Рецензия на книгу: Латур Б. Наука в действии: следуя за учеными и инженерами внутри общества. Социология власти, 1: 248-255.
Фуко М. (2005) Нужно защищать общество: Курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де Франс в 1975-1976 учебном году, СПб.: Наука.
Фуко М. (2010) Рождение биополитики. Курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де Франс в 1978-1979 учебном году, СПб.: Наука.
Фуко М. (2011) Безопасность, территория, население. Курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де Франс в 1977-1978 учебном году, СПб.: Наука.
Barry А. (1996) Lines of Communication and Spaces of Rule. A. Barry, Th. Osborne,
N. Rose (eds.) Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press: 123-142.
Inda J.X. (2005) Analytics of the modern: an introduction. Inda J.X. (ed.) Anthropologies of modernity: Foucault, governmentality and life politics, Oxford: Blackwell: 1-22.
Merry S.E. (2016) The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence and Sex Trafficking, Chicago; London: Chicago University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN UTKKXW
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)