Ne mech, no mir: Blumer как prokuror empiricheskoy sotsiologii (A Peace, Not a Sword: Blumer as a Prosecutor of Public Sociology). Review: Blumer H. (2017) Simvolicheskiy interaktsionizm. Perspektiva і metod (Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method). М.: Elementarnyie Formy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2017-4-282-291Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Соколов М.М., Титаев К.Д. (2013) Провинциальная и туземная наука. Антропологический форум, 19: 239-275
Best J. (2006) Blumer's dilemma: The critic as a tragic figure. The American Sociologist, 37(3): 6-7
A Blumer bibliography (https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Blumer/Blumer_Bibliographyl.html)
Hammersley M. (1992) What's wrong with ethnography? London; New York: Routledge
Savage М., Burrows R. (2009) Some further reflections on the coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 43 (4): 762-772
Downloads
Published
2017-07-15
Issue
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Rudenko N.L. Ne mech, no mir: Blumer как prokuror empiricheskoy sotsiologii (A Peace, Not a Sword: Blumer as a Prosecutor of Public Sociology). Review: Blumer H. (2017) Simvolicheskiy interaktsionizm. Perspektiva і metod (Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method). М.: Elementarnyie Formy // Sociology of Power. 2017. Vol. 29, no. 4. P. 282–291. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2017-4-282-291
Коды статьи
- EDN UTKLAO