Ne mech, no mir: Blumer как prokuror empiricheskoy sotsiologii (A Peace, Not a Sword: Blumer as a Prosecutor of Public Sociology). Review: Blumer H. (2017) Simvolicheskiy interaktsionizm. Perspektiva і metod (Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method). М.: Elementarnyie Formy

Authors

  • Nikolay L. Rudenko Социологический институт РАН филиал Федерального научноисследовательского социологического центра РАН , Sociological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences branch of Federal center of theoretical and applied sociology of the Russian academy of science Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2017-4-282-291

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Соколов М.М., Титаев К.Д. (2013) Провинциальная и туземная наука. Антропологический форум, 19: 239-275

Best J. (2006) Blumer's dilemma: The critic as a tragic figure. The American Sociologist, 37(3): 6-7

A Blumer bibliography (https://brocku.ca/MeadProject/Blumer/Blumer_Bibliographyl.html)

Hammersley M. (1992) What's wrong with ethnography? London; New York: Routledge

Savage М., Burrows R. (2009) Some further reflections on the coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 43 (4): 762-772

Downloads

Published

2017-07-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Rudenko N.L. Ne mech, no mir: Blumer как prokuror empiricheskoy sotsiologii (A Peace, Not a Sword: Blumer as a Prosecutor of Public Sociology). Review: Blumer H. (2017) Simvolicheskiy interaktsionizm. Perspektiva і metod (Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method). М.: Elementarnyie Formy // Sociology of Power. 2017. Vol. 29, no. 4. P. 282–291. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2017-4-282-291

Коды статьи

  • EDN UTKLAO