How to look at "The City of the Peaceful Atom" from the Perspective of the Social Network? Or: In Search of Lost Modernity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2018-3-93-126Keywords:
online community, retro-city, digital ethnography of vision, analytical zooming, collaboration, ways of seeing, optical patterns, nuclear canon, local nuclear history, nuclear urbanism, ObninskAbstract
On content, this article combines visual studies and digital ethnography of vision in order to investigate the local ways of seeing practiced by the participants of the Retro Obninsk network community when looking at old photos of the "city of the peaceful atom”. In terms of epistemology, the article captures the digital shifts in the work of a social researcher when using qualitative approaches: the need for joint distributed work, accumulation and analysis of enlarged data, saturation of qualitative research with data, increased sensitivity to the analytical use of zoom and scaling, interest in patterns, etc. The text consists of three parts. The first part describes an experimental design of a qualitative research training aimed at discovering the joint discursive and visual production of retro optics for Obninsk, emphasizing the importance of infrastructure for the organization of distributed digital research and problematizing the qualitative work with patterns. In the second part - centered around the logic of "zooming out” - Retro Obninsk is characterized by its specificity against the background of other retro-cities existing on the VKontakte platform, as an open hyperspectacular community. In the third part - centered around the logic of "zooming in” - the article explicates the optical patterns of Retro Obninsk from the collected data. These patterns include: bringing the lower boundary of the "retro” into chronological correspondence with the end of the Soviet period and searching for its visible markers; a preference for authentic "seeing something as something” over "seeing in comparison”, eliminating the discovery and discussion of affinity in the architecture of Soviet nuclear cities; a detailing view that protects an observer against immersion in the local nuclear history; the technological appropriation of "retro” and its adaptation to actual visual standards; a fascination with panorama-perspectives and a longing for the (nuclear) modernity embodied in the urban form.Downloads
References
Абрамов Р. (2011) "Советский чердак" российской блогосферы: анализ ностальгических виртуальных сообществ. ИНТЕР, 1 (6): 88-102
Витгенштейн Л. (2011) Философские исследования, М.: ACT
ВНИПИЭТ: годы свершений (2007). авт.-сост. Карл Рендель, СПб
Касаткина А. (2017) ВКонтакте» с историей: историческая культура соучастия в группе «Ретро Обнинск». Электронный научно-образовательный журнал История, (7)
Касаткина А. (2016) На пути к открытым качественным данным. Электронный научно-образовательный журнал История, (7)
Касаткина А. (2017) Культурное наследие, интернет множество и перспективы DH. Топос, (1-2): 280-293.
Моретти Ф. (2016) Дальнее чтение, пер. с англ. А. Вдовина, О. Собчука, А. Шели, М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара.
Орлова Г. (2016) Собирая проект. Шаги/Step, 3(1): 154-166.
Орлова Г. (2016а) Со-авторизация, но не соавторство: приключения транскрипта в цифровую эпоху. Шаги/Steps, 3(1): 200-223.
Орлова Г. (20166) Визуализировать медиа: Лев Манович между переводом и вторичным картированием. Практики и интерпретации: журнал филологических, образовательных и культурных исследований, 1 (3): 45-63.
Орлова Г. (2016в) Е-Оксюморон: дигитальное как качественное. Электронный научно-образовательный журнал История, (7): 137-164.
Орлова Г. (2017) Курирование как предчувствие: о цифровой интерпелляции гуманитария. Topos, (1-2): 93-111.
Орлова Г. (2018). Время зуммировать: цифровое чтение в поисках масштаба. Новое литературное обозрение, (2).
Попова К. (2017) Исследования визуального в этнометодологии. Социологическое обозрение, 16 (3): 212-232.
Bаrаn К., Stock W. (2015) Facebook has been smacked down. The Russian special way of SNSs: Vkontakte as a case study. Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Social Media (ECSM 2015), 9(10).
Bennett T. (2013) The birth of the museum: History, theory, politics. Routledge.
Boyer M. (1996) The city of collective memory: its historical imagery and architectural entertainments, MIT Press.
Brown D. (2002) Going Digital and Staying Qualitative: Some Alternative Strategies for Digitizing the Qualitative Research Process. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 3 (2)
(http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0202122). Burdick A., Drucker J. et al. (2012) Digital Humanities, MIT Press.
Cohen D., Scheinfeldt J. (2013) Hacking the academy: New approaches to scholarship and teaching from digital humanities, University of Michigan Press.
Crary J. (1992) Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the XIX century, MIT Press.
Elkins J. (2007) How to use your eyes. Routledge.
Goodwin Ch. (1994) Professional vision. American anthropologist, 96 (3): 606-633. Hampton K., Wellman B. (2003) Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet supports community and social capital in a wired suburb. City and Community, 2 (4): 277-311.
Kelty С. (2009) Collaboration, Coordination, and Composition: Fieldwork after the Internet. Faubion J.D., Marcus G.E. (eds). Fieldwork is not what it used to be: Learning anthropology's method in a time of transition? Cornell University Press: 184-206.
Kepes G. (1958) The new landscape in art and science, Paul Theobald and Co.
Manovich L. (2013) Software takes command, A&C Black.
McTavish L. (2006) Learning to see in New Brunswick, 1862-1929. Canadian historical review, 87 (3): 553-581.
Mirzoeff N. (1999) An Introduction to Visual Culture, Psychology Press.
Mitchell T. (2002) Showing seeing: a critique of visual culture. Journal of visual culture, 1 (2): 165-181.
Moyle М., Tonra J., Wallace V. (2011) Manuscript transcription by crowdsourcing: Transcribe Bentham. Liber Quarterly, 20 (3/4): 347-356
Orlova G., Kasatkina A. (2017) Wide open qualitative data: the Obninsk digital project as an ethical dispositive. Russian Journal of Communication, 9 (3): 328-335.
Presner T. et al. (2009) The digital humanities manifesto 2.0. UCLA Mellon Seminar in Digital Humanities (http://www.humanitiesblast. com/manifesto/Manifesto_V. 2).
Samostienko E. (2017) Digital iconoclasm and the new challenges of cognitive ethics: the case of web project Fiber. Russian Journal of Communication, 9 (3): 268-277.
Tifentale A. (2017) Rules of the Photographers' Universe. Photoresearcher, 27 (4): 68-77.
Urry J. (2002) The Tourist Gaze, Sage.
White S., McAllister I. (2014) Did Russia (nearly) have a Facebook revolution in 2011?
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN YMCUQH
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)