The Body Multiple And The Multimodality Of Death

Authors

  • Sergei V. Sokolovskiy Институт этнологии и антропологии РАН , Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2019-2-155-175

Keywords:

social body, hybridity, assemblage, Death definition, extension, inscription, incorporation, commemorative infrastructure

Abstract

The article employs the actor-network methodology within the context of death studies - specifically, the concepts of assemblage and hybridity - to deal with such issues as the definition of death and commemoration of the deceased. The multiplicity of the human body is primarily conceptualized as its entanglement with various elements of the environment, exemplified by contemporary concepts such as embodied mind, situated and distributed cognition, enhanced and extended memory, etc. The author proposes a working typology of techno-somatic assemblages or integration types - including body techniques, incorporation, extensions, and inscriptions (translations, delegation of actions) - and poses the question about the post-mortal fate of the aggregates that have been based on these types of integration. A brief overview of the concepts of biological death and the social body suggests that human death is multimodal and heterochronous: the moment of biological death does not coincide with the time of social death. The post-mortal social body is viewed as a set of transformed assemblages and their parts or elements that - by serving as triggers for the memorialization acts for friends and relatives of the deceased - shape and inform commemorative infrastructures. The techno-somatic assemblages that include human bodies as their elements do not disappear at the biological body's death - they transform. Routine activities of the distributed self leave lasting marks that form the complex geography of commemoration and memorialization loci.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Вернадский В.И. (1988 ) Философские мысли натуралиста, М.: Наука

Деррида Ж. (2000) О грамматологии , М.: Ad Marginem

Латур Б. (2004) Где недостающая масса? Социология одной двери. Неприкосновенный запас, 34 (2): 5-19

Латур Б. (2014) Пересборка социального: введение в акторно-сетевую теорию, М.: ИД ВШЭ

Ницше Ф. (1990) К генеалогии морали. Полемическое сочинение. Ницше Ф. Сочинения. Т. 2, М.: Мысль: 407-524

Соколовский С.В. (2016) К самим вещам? (об онтологическом повороте в социальных и гуманитарных дисциплинах). Этнометодология, 21: 10-35

Уайтхед А.Н. (1990) Избранные работы по философии, М.: Прогресс

Уорнер У.Л. (2000) Живые и мертвые, М.: Университетская книга

Akrich M., Latour B. (1992) A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies. W. Bijker, J. Law (eds) Shaping Technology,Building Society, Cambridge: MIT Press: 259-264.

Ball A. (2018) Book review: Manuel DeLanda. Assemblage theory. Parrhesia, 29: 241-247.

Bateson G. (1987 ) Steps to Ecology of Mind, London: Jason Aronson Inc.

Crossley N. (2001) The Social Body. Habit, Identity, and Desire, London: Sage.Clark A., Chalmers D. (1998) The extended mind. Analysis, 58: 7-19.

DeLanda V. (2016) Assemblage Theory, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University press.

Douglas M. (1970) Natural Symbols. Explorations in Cosmology, London: Routledge.

Engelbart D. (1962,) Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework. SRI Summary Report, No. 3223, Washington, DC.: Air Force Office for Scientific Research.

Holiday R. (2019) Totto-Chan: The Little Girl at the Window by Tetsuko Kuroyanagi (ryanholiday.net).

Hutchins E. (1996) Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Kapp E. (1877) Grundlinien einer Philosophie der Technik. Zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Kultur aus neuen Gesichtspunkten, Braunschweig: George Westermann.

Lafitte J. (1972) Reflexions sur la science des machines, Paris: Vrin.

Leroi-Gourhan A. (1945) Evolution et techniques. Vol. 1. L'Homme et la matiere. 1943;Vol. 2. Milieu et techniques, Paris: Editions Albin Michel.

Leroi-Gourhan A. (1993) Gesture and Speech, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Lock M. (1999) The Problem of Brain Death: Japanese Disputes about Bodies and Modernity. S. Youngner, R. Arnold, R. Schapiro (eds) The Definition of Death Contemporary Controversies, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press: 239-256.

Mauss M. (1936 ) Les techniques du corps. JournaldePsychologie, 32 (3-4): 365-386.

Mol A. (2002) Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice, Durham (N.C.): Duke University press.

Muller S. (2018) Distributed corporeality: Anatomy, knowledge and the technological reconfiguration of bodies in ballet. Social Studies of Science. OnlineFirst, (0) 0: 1-22 (DOI: 10.1177/0306312718811636).

Nietzsche F. (1999) Zur Genealogie der Moral In: Friedrich Nietzsche. Samtliche Werke in 15 Bd. Kritische Studienausgabe, Bd 5, Munchen: de Gruyter: 245-412.

Shilling C. (1993) The Body and Social Theory, London: Sage.

Sutton J. (2008) Distributed cognition: Domains and dimensions. I.E. Dror, S. Harnad (eds) Cognition Distributed. How cognitive technology extends our minds, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publ. Co.: 45-56.

Synnott A. (1993) The Body Social. Symbolism, Self, and Society, London: Routledge.

Turner B. (1984) The Body and Society. Explorations in Social Theory, London: Sage (3rd rev. ed., 2008).

Varela F., Thompson E., Rosch E. (1993) The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience, Cambridge: MIT Press.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sokolovskiy S.V. The Body Multiple And The Multimodality Of Death // Sociology of Power. 2019. Vol. 31, no. 2. P. 155–175. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2019-2-155-175

Коды статьи

  • EDN HCPFMM
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)