Communitas as the "essential We": The Possibility of Dialogical Relationships in a Community
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2019-4-155-184Keywords:
communitas, community, dialogical philosophy, “i-thou” relation, “essential we”, effervescence, turner, buber, durkheimAbstract
This article aims to revise a common interpretation of V. Turner's concept of communitas in the context of the dialogical philosophy of М. Buber, whose influence has been mostly overlooked by researchers. Communitas is usually seen from the Durkheimian perspective and his notions of the sacred, solidarity and especially effervescence; it is conventionally defined as a transgressive collective experience when individual identities are supposed to submerge into a collective whole. Turner himself, however, has repeatedly noted that communitas is based on the ideas of the “I-Thou” relationship and the “essential We” developed by Buber. A reconstruction of the notion in question together with a recap of Buber's dialogical philosophy allow to clarify the key characteristics of communitas which make it distinct from other similar concepts of community. The main feature of communitas lays in its inherent idea of individualized community where individuals preserve their independence and relate to each other as “totalities”. The notion of “totality” traces back to Buber's concept of “synthesizing apperception” which means the perception of the Other in full wholeness of his/her irreducible personal uniqueness. The “synthesizing apperception” as well as the “I-Thou” relationship require “the primal setting at a distance” which allows an individual not to lose his/her distinctiveness and personal “self”. Other characteristics of communitas, which are making it similar to the “I-Thou” relationship and the “essential We”, include its transience and instability, the dissolution of all inner and outer group boundaries, and its ethical component, which was found to be ideologically rooted in Judaism. Spontaneous communitas and the “I-Thou” relationship (“essential We”) turn out to be almost identical in Turner's descriptions, who incorporated the dialogical vision of relationships between “I” and the Other into the anthropological theory of group interactions in a community.Downloads
References
Бубер М. (1995) Два образа веры, М.: "Республика"
Куракин Д.Ю. (2011) Ускользающее сакральное: проблема амбивалентности сакрального и ее значение для "сильной программы" культурсоциологии. Социологическое обозрение, 10 (3): 41-70.
Лифинцева Т.П. (1999) Философия диалога Мартина Бубера, М.: РАН Институт философии.
Тэрнер В. (1983) Символ и ритуал, М.: Наука.
Юдин Г. (2013) Коллективное и индивидуальное в философской антропологии Э. Дюркгейма. Социологическое обозрение, 12 (2): 122-132.
Сокулер З.А. (2008) Герман Коген и философия диалога, М.: Прогресс-Традиция.
Alexander J.C. (2005) The inner development of Durkheim's sociological theory: from early writings to maturity. J. C. Alexander, P. Smith (eds) The Cambridge companion to Durkheim, New York: Cambridge University Press: 136-159.
Beaumont E., Brown D. (2018) 'It's the sea and the beach more than anything for me': Local surfer's and the construction of community and communitas in a rural Cornish seaside village. Journal of rural studies, (59): 58-66.
Bowring F. (2016) The individual and society in Durkheim: Unpicking the contradictions. European Journal of Social Theory, 19 (1): 21-38.
Buber M. (2003) Between man and man, London: Routledge.
Buber M. (2002) Distance and Relation. A. Biemann (ed.) The Martin Buber reader: essential writings, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Buber M. (1958) Hasidism and Modern Man, New York: Horizon Press.
Durkheim E. (1973) Emile Durkheim on morality and society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Durkheim E. (1995) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, New York: The Free Press. Gurvitch G. (1941) Mass, community, communion. The Journal of Philosophy, 38 (18): 485-496.
Hayton J. (2018) "They do treat us as a bit normal now": Students' experiences of liminality and communitas whilst volunteering on a sports-based outreach project. International review for the sociology of sport, 53 (7): 869-889.
Jencson L. (2001) Disastrous rites: liminality and communitas in a flood crisis. Anthropology and Humanism, 26 (1): 46-58.
LaCarpa D. (1972) Emile Durkheim. Sociologist and Philosopher, New York: Cornell University Press.
Letkemann P.G. (2002) The office workplace: Communitas and hierarchical social structures. Anthropologica, 44 (2): 257-269.
Milbank J. (2006) Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Olaveson T. (2001) Collective effervescence and communitas: Processual models of ritual and society in Emile Durkheim and Victor Turner. Dialectical Anthropology, 26 (2): 89-124.
Poma A. (1997) Critical Philosophy of Hermann Cohen, Albany: SUNY Press.
Ramp W. (1998) Effervescence, differentiation and representation in The Elementary Forms. N. Allen, W. Pickering, W. Miller (eds) On Durkheim's Elementary Forms of Religious Life, London: Routledge: 136-148.
Turner E. (2012) Communitas: The anthropology of collective joy, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Turner V., Schechner, R. (1988) The anthropology of performance, New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications.
Turner V. (1973) The center out there: Pilgrim's goal. History of religions, 12 (3): 191-230. Turner V. (1975) Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society, New York: Cornell University Press.
Turner V. (1979) Process, performance, and pilgrimage: a study in comparative symbology, New Dehli: Concept publishing company.
Turner V. (1980) Encounter with Freud: the making of a comparative symbologist. G. Spindler (ed.) The making of psychological anthropology, Berkeley: University of California Press: 558-583.
Turner V. (1982) From ritual to theatre: The human seriousness of play, New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications.
Turner V. (1974) Liminal to liminoid, in play, flow, and ritual: an essay in comparative symbology. Rice Institute Pamphlet-Rice University Studies, 60 (3): 53-92.
Turner V. (1991) The ritual process: Structure and anti structure, New York: Cornell University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN JLQWFI
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)