Neural Network Nebulae: 'Black Boxes’ of Technologies and Object-Lessons from the Opacities of Algorithms

Authors

  • Andrei G. Kuznetsov European University at Saint-Petersburg , ITMO University Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-2-157-182

Keywords:

машинное обучение, value neutrality of technologies, black boxes, neural networks, machine learning, self-driving cars, science & technology studies (STS)

Abstract

The paper deals with the quandary of the neutrality and transparency of technologies. First, I show how this problem is connected with the image of the opening of 'black boxes' that is pivotal to much of science and technology studies. Second, methodological and socio-political dimensions of the 'black box' metaphor are discussed. Third, I analyze three typical solutions to the problem of the neutrality of technologies outside and inside constructivist technology studies. It is demonstrated that despite their apparent differences, these solutions are similar in their logic of conceptualizing technology as a neutral intermediary. Forth, I look for an alternative to this logic in the actor-network theory of Bruno Latour. Here technologies are conceived in terms of an eventful association of heterogeneous entities irreducible to its conditions of possibility. The construction of technologies is understood as mediation, or as a 'making-do' process where creators are surprised by their creations and vice versa. In Latour's actor-network, technologies are interpreted as opaque and non-neutral entities. Finally, I turn to some object-lessons from smart technologies powered by neural networks to demonstrate that these are empirical vindications of Latour's conception of technical mediation. Particular attention is paid to the opacity and (non)interpretability of machine learning algorithms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Каллон М. (2015) Некоторые элементы социологии перевода: одомашнивание морских гребешков и рыбаков залива Сен-Бриё. Социология власти, 27 (1): 196-231.

Кузнецов А.Г. (2015) Латур и его "технолог": вещи, объекты и технологии в акторно-сетевой теории. Социология власти, 27 (1): 55-89.

Латур Б., Вулгар С. (2012) Лабораторная жизнь. Конструирование научных фактов. Глава 2. Антрополог посещает лабораторию. Социология власти, 6-7: 178-234.

Латур Б. (2006) Об интеробъективности. В.С. Вахштайн (ред.) Социология вещей, М.: Изд. дом "Территория будущего": 169-199.

Латур Б. (2013) Наука в действии: следуя за учеными и инженерами внутри общества, СПб.: Изд-во Европейского ун-та в С.-Петербурге.

Латур Б. (2014) Пересборка социального: введение в акторно-сетевую теорию, М.: ИД ВШЭ.

Скотт Дж. (2005) Благими намерениями государства, М.: Университетская книга.

Ananny M., Crawford K. (2016) Seeing Without Knowing: Limitations of the Transparency Ideal and Its Application to Algorithmic Accountability. New Media & Society, 20 (3): 980-981.

Bijker W., Law J. (eds) (1992) Shaping Technology /Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, Mass.; London: MIT Press.

Bloor D. (1991 [1976]) Knowledge and Social Imagery, 2nd ed., Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press.

Burrell J. (2016) How the Machine 'Thinks': Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3 (1): 1-12.

Diakopoulos N. (2013,) Algorithmic Accountability Reporting: On the Investigation of Black Boxes. Report, Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia University. (https:// academiccommons.columbia.edu/doi/10.7916/D8ZK5TW2)

Dougherty C. (2015) Google photos mistakenly labels black people "gorillas". The New York Times, 1 July. (http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/07/01/google-photos-mistak-enly-labels-black-people-gorillas)

Edge D. (1979) Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Critical Review. History of Science, 17 (2): 102-114.

Fuller S. (1997) Constructing the High Church-Low Church Distinction in STS Textbooks. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 17 (4): 181-183.

Jasanoff S. (ed.) (2004) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order, London; New York: Routledge.

Johnson J. (1988) Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer. Social Problems, 35 (3): 298-310.

Latour B., Mauguin Ph., Teil G. (1992) A Note on Socio-Technical Graphs. Social Studies of Science, 22 (1): 33-57.

Latour B., Woolgar S. (1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Latour B. (1990) Technology Is Society Made Durable. The Sociological Review, 38 (1_ suppl): 103-131.

Latour B. (1992) Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. W. Bijker, J. Law (eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, Mass.; London: MIT Press: 225-259.

Latour B. (1994) On Technical Mediation: Philosophy, Sociology, Genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3 (2): 29-64.

Latour B. (1996) Aramis, or The Love of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.; London: Harvard University Press.

Latour B. (1999) Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Latour B. (2004) Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry, 30 (2): 225-248.

Lipson H., Kurman M. (2016) Driverless: Intelligent Cars and the Road Ahead, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Madrigal A. (2014) How Netflix Reverse-Engineered Hollywood? The Atlantic, January 2. (https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/01/how-netflix-reverse-engineered-hollywood/282679/)

Miller B. (2020) Is Technology Value-Neutral? Science, Technology, & Human Values, First Published Online January 22. (https://journals.sagepub.com/ doi/10.1177/0162243919900965)

Neyland D. (2015) Bearing Account-Able Witness to the Ethical Algorithmic System. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41 (1): 50-76.

Ogburn W.F. (1964) On Culture and Social Change: Selected Papers, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Pasquale F. (2015) The Black Box Society, Cambridge, Mass.; London: Harvard University Press.

Pinch T., Bijker W. (1984) The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other. Social Studies of Science, 14 (3): 399-441.

Pitt J.C. (2014) Guns Don't Kill, People Kill"; Values in and/or around Technologies. P. Kroes, P.-P. Verbeek (eds) The Moral Status of Technical Artifacts, Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer: 89-101.

Spolsky J. (2000) Things You Should Never Do, Part I. (https://www.joelonsoftware. com/2000/04/06/things-you-should-never-do-part-i/)

Stilgoe J. (2017) Machine Learning, Social Learning and the Governance of Self-Driving Cars. Social Studies of Science, 48 (1): 25-56.

Vanderbilt T. (2012) Let the robot drive: The autonomous car of the future is here. Wired, January 20. (https://www.wired.com/2012/01/ff_autonomouscars/2/)

Wade L. (2010) HP software doesn't see black people. Sociological Images, 5 January. (https:// thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/01/05/hp-software-doesnt-see-black-people/)

Winner L. (1988) The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Woolgar S., Cooper G. (1999) Do Artefacts Have Ambivalence? Moses' Bridges, Winner's Bridges and Other Urban Legends in S&TS. Social Studies of Science, 29 (3): 433-449.

Weber A. (2012 [1920]) Fundamentals of Cultural Sociology: Social Process, Civilizational Process and Cultural Movement. C. Loader (ed.). Alfred Weber and the Crisis of Culture, 1890-1933, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, US: 165-205.

Wynne B. (1988) Unruly Technology: Practical Rules, Impractical Discourses and Public Understanding. Social Studies of Science, 18 (1): 147-167.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kuznetsov A.G. Neural Network Nebulae: ’Black Boxes’ of Technologies and Object-Lessons from the Opacities of Algorithms // Sociology of Power. 2020. Vol. 32, no. 2. P. 157–182. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2020-2-157-182

Коды статьи

  • EDN OJYPQZ
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)