Mystery of the Form Itself: the Return of the Value Problem

Authors

  • Vadim G. Kvachev Plekhanov Russian University of Economics Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-1-103-124

Keywords:

value, labour theory of value, marxism, capital, power

Abstract

The theory of value is one of the fundamental topics of political economy; it lays the very foundation for its functioning. The theory of value radically affects both the research program and the political views of economists and social theorists. Today, the question of value is considered to be settled, at least within the economic mainstream. Sometimes it is considered simply irrelevant or outside the field of study of "real" science. But the very desire to leave this question unresolved (to abandon the consideration of the theory of value in general) or to find a temporary solution for it (to deal with the issues of price instead of the issue of value) represents evidence that we are dealing with an epistemological obstacle, the very complexity of which reflects some of the contradictions of capitalism. The issue of value is not only a matter of economics; it should be viewed through an interdisciplinary perspective. But, first of all, it is a socio-philosophical question in the broadest sense of the word. Returning to the question of value will allow us to take a fresh look at the "mystery of the form in itself", the commodity form, which was the central object of consideration of the political economy of Marx. This article proposes to re-raise the question of value as a socio-philosophical basis for a criticism of modern capitalism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Визер Ф. (1992 [1914]) Теория общественного хозяйства (избр. гл.). Австрийская школа в политической экономии: К. Менгер, Е. Бём-Баверк, Ф. Визер. Пер. с нем., предисл., коммент., сост. В.С.Автономова, М.: Экономика

Вирно П. (2013) Грамматика множества: к анализу форм современной жизни, М.: Ад Маргинем Пресс

Дардо П., Лаваль К. (2011) Неолиберализм и капиталистическая субъективация. Логос, 80 (1): 103-117

Жижек С. (1999) Возвышенный объект идеологии, М.: Художественный журнал

Жижек С. (2004) Ирак: история про чайник. М.: Издательская группа "Праксис"

Маршалл А. (1984) Принципы политической экономии, М.: Прогресс

Мейсон П. (2016) Посткапитализм. Путеводитель по нашему будущему, М.: Ад Маргинем

Менгер К. (2005) Избранные работы, М.: Территория будущего

Пашуканис Е.Б. (1929) Общая теория права и марксизм, М.: Коммунистическая Академия. (http://kritikaprava.org/library/31/obschaya_teoriya_prava_i_marksizm)

Рубин И. (1929) Очерки по теории стоимости Маркса, М.: Государственное издательство. (https://zarya.xyz/ocherki-po-teorii-stoimosti-marksa/ 21)

Самуэльсон П. (1993) Экономика, М

Сергеев А.А. (1977) Стоимость. Большая советская энциклопедия. T.24. Часть 3. М.: Советская энциклопедия: 2493

Фуко М. (2010) Рождение биополитики. Курс лекций, прочитанных в Коллеж де Франс в 1978-1979 учебном году, М.: Наука

Хоркхаймер М., Адорно Т. (1997) Диалектика просвещения: философские фрагменты, М.; СПб.: Медиум, Ювента

Blaug M. (1992) The methodology of economics, or, How economists explain, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press

Bonefeld W. (2010) Abstract labour: Against its nature and on its time. Capital & Class, 34 (2)

Elson D. (1979) The value theory of labour. The Representation of Labour in Capitalism, London: CSE Books

Jevons W.S. (1911) The Theory of Political Economy. (https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/jevons/TheoryPoliticalEconomy.pdf )

Kerr D. (1994) Trial by space. Common Sense, 15: 18-35

Kvachev V. (2020) Unflat Ontology: Essay on the Poverty of Democratic Materialism. Stasis, 9 (1)

Lefebvre H. (2009) Dialectical Materialism. Minnesota: The University of Minnesota Press

Marx K. (1890) Das Kapital. Vol. I. (https://content.csbs.utah.edu/~ehrbar/cap1.pdf). Minsky H.P. (2008 [1986]) Stabilizing the Unstable Economу. New Haven: Yale University Press

Mises L. von (1957) Psychology and Thymology. London: Theory and History: 272. Nitzan J., Bichker Sh. (2009) Capital as Power, N.Y.: Routledge

O'Kane C. (2020) The Critique of Real Abstraction: from the Critical Theory of Society to the Critique of Political Economy and Back Again. Marx and Contemporary Critical Theory. New York: Springer

Postone M. (2003) Time, labor, and social domination: A reinterpretation of Marx's critical theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Pranama ECO (2020) Веб-сайт. (https://pranamateco.ru/)

Reichelt H. (2005) Social Reality as Appearance: Some Notes on Marx's Conception of Reality. Human Dignity, Routledge

Robinson J. (1974) Economic Philosoph, Suffolk: Pelican Books

Sohn-Rethel A. (1978) Intellectual And Manual Labour: A Critique Of Epistemology. Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey: Humanities Press

Harvey D. (2018) Marx's Refusal of the Labour Theory of Value. (http://davidharvey.org/2018/03/marxs-refusal-of-the-labour-theory-of-value-by-david-harvey/)

Zizek S (2012) Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. London: Verso

Downloads

Published

2021-01-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kvachev V.G. Mystery of the Form Itself: the Return of the Value Problem // Sociology of Power. 2021. Vol. 33, no. 1. P. 103–124. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-1-103-124

Коды статьи

  • EDN ODGWBP
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)