Influence of the Structure of the Organizational Field of Small Animal Veterinary Medicine on the Processes of Professionalization of Veterinarians
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2022-4-247-273Keywords:
veterinary medicine, small pets, organizational field, professionalizationAbstract
This text was conceived as an attempt to describe the organizational field of veterinary medicine of companion animals in Russia and its impact on the processes of formation of the profession of veterinarians of companion animals as a separate professional group. Having emerged in the early 1990s in Russia as a separate branch of veterinary medicine, veterinary medicine of companion aimals has gone from intuitive practices of treating dogs and cats to a complex organizational field with many actors. Despite such rapid development, this area, unlike agricultural veterinary medicine, still considerably lacks strong institutional regulation. The profession of a veterinarian of companion animals does not live in the conventional continental model of professionalization for our region but it is market-oriented and develops through the veterinarians' own efforts while they do not exist outside veterinary clinics - their own organizational field. The article offers a description of this organizational field and analyzes the influence of its structure on the processes of professionalization of veterinarians of companion animals.Downloads
References
Беккер Г. (1994) Природа профессии. Этика успеха: вестник исследователей, консультантов и ЛПР, выпуск 3/94
Домницкий И. Ю. (2017) История ветеринарной медицины: краткий курс лекций для обучающихся специальности "Ветеринария", Саратов
Профессиональный стандарт "Ветеринарный врач" от 23 августа 2018 г. № 547н
Brown C. A., Elliott J., Schmiedt C. W., Brown S. A. (2016) Chronic kidney disease in aged cats: clinical features, morphology, and proposed pathogeneses. Veterinary pathology, 53(2): 309-326.
Carr-Saunders A. M., Wilson P. A. (1933) The Professions. Clarendon.
Carr-Saunders A. M., Wilson P. A. (1944) Professions. Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, New York: The Macmillan Company. Vol. 12.
Collins R. (1990) Market closure and the conflict theory of the professions. Professions in theory and history: Rethinking the study of the professions: 24-43.
Fligstein N. (2001) The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Freidson E. (1988) Profession of Medicine. A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge, University of Chicago Press.
Goode W. J. (1957) Community within a community: The professions. American sociological review, 22(2): 194-200.
Greenwood E. (1957) Attributes of a profession. Social work: 45-55.
Larson M. (1977) The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis, California: University of California.
Leicht K. T., Fennell M. L., Freidson E. (2003) Professional work, a sociological approach. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28(1).
Liu S. (2018) Boundaries and professions: Toward a processual theory of action. Journal of Professions and Organization, 5(1): 45-57.
Macdonald K., Ritzer G. (1988) The sociology of the professions: dead or alive? Work and Occupations, 15(3): 251-272.
McKinlay J. B., Arches J. (1985) Towards the proletarianization of physicians.International journal of health services, 15(2): 161-195.
Millerson G. (2013) The qualifying associations, Routledge.
Muzio D., Brock D. M., Suddaby R. (2013) Professions and institutional change: Towards an institutionalist sociology of the professions. Journal of management studies, 50(5): 699-721.
Narayan U. (1999) The Project of Feminist Epistemology: Perspective from.
Parkin F. (1979) Marxism and Class Theory: A bourgeois critique, London: Tavistock. Parsons T. (1939) The professions and social structure. Social forces, 17(4): 457467.
Powell W. W., DiMaggio P. J. (Eds) (2012) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, University of Chicago press.
Saks M. (2015) The professions, state and the market: Medicine in Britain, the United States and Russia, Routledge.
Scott W. R. (2008) Lords of the dance: Professionals as institutional agents. Organization studies, 29(2): 219-238.
Suddaby R., Muzio D. (2015) Theoretical perspectives on the professions. The Oxford handbook of professional service firms: 25-47.
Suddaby R., Viale T. (2011) Professionals and field-level change: Institutional work and the professional project. Current Sociology, 59(4): 423-442.
Svensson L. G., & Evetts J. (2010) Sociology of professions. Continental and Anglo-Saxon Traditions, Gothenburg: Daidalos.
Wilensky H. L. (1964) The professionalization of everyone? American journal of sociology, 70(2): 137-158.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN JLDRPC
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)
