Studies of Expertise and Experience as a Way to Overcome the Crisis of Expert Knowledge: The Problem of Philosophical Foundations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2023-4-141-158

Keywords:

sociology of expertise, interactional expertise, form of life, H. Collins, R. Evans

Abstract

The focus of the article is the project of British sociologists H. Collins and R. Evans on the Study of Expertise and Experience (SEE). The author of this article attempts to explicate the contexts of talking about expertise as a sociopolitical phenomenon. On the one hand, expertise is discussed in one line of research as an important component of socio-political processes. Expertise is defined in terms of power, its ability to influence decision-making processes in a legitimising way is increasing. On the other hand, the socio-ontological status of expertise is leveled due to the democratisation of access to information and the divergence of the modes of co-existence of science and politics, which is why, according to the researchers, expertise is in crisis. In these contexts, the author turns to the SEE project, which seeks to address the side effects of the proliferation of constructivist sociologies of knowledge and science. By questioning the ability of groups to access the truth and formulate expert judgements on its behalf, constructivist sociology removed the expert as a bearer of specified knowledge from the intellectual scene. Collins and Evans put expertise back on the research agenda; they propose a normative typology of expertise. The author of the article reconstructs the logic of constructing classifications of expertise and problematising two of its key types - interactional and contributory expertise. The article describes in detail the philosophical assumptions behind the concept of interactional expertise. The claims of this concept - as the author of the project sees it - to describe not only a common type of expertise, but also to become one of the conceptual resources for describing society are questionable, due to linguistic reductionism. Collins and Evans reproduce classic problems of sociological theory within the primary distinction of types of expertise.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Vladislav R. Kalinin, MSSES

    Vladislav R. Kalinin — MA in Sociology, MSSES, senior lecturer MSSES.

    Moscow

References

Ашкеров А. А. (2009) Экспертократия. Управление знаниями: производство и обращение информации в эпоху ультракапитализма. М.: Европа.

Кнорр-Цетина К. (2006) Социальность и объекты. Социальные отношения в пост-социальных обществах знания. Социология вещей. М.: Территория будущего: 267-306.

Николс Т. (2019) Смерть экспертизы: как интернет убивает научные знания. М.: Бомбра.

Решетников А. В., Айвазян Ш. Г., Присяжная Н. В. (2020) Роль участкового врача во мнениях молодых и опытных профессионалов. Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены, 2: 331-346. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.2.764

Полани М. (1995) Личностное знание. На пути к посткритической философии / Под ред. В. А. Лекторского, В. А. Аршинова; пер. с англ. М. Б. Гнедовского, Н. М. Смирновой, Б. А. Старостина. М.

Столярова О. (2018) Третья волна исследований науки как философское обоснование STS. Логос, 28, 5(126): 31-52.

Уинч П. (1996) Идеи социальной науки и ее отношение к философии / Перевод с англ. М. Горбачева, Т. Дмитриева. М.: Русское феноменологическое общество.

Филиппов А. Ф. (2003) Теоретические основания социологии пространства. М.: Канон-ПрессЦ.

Фуллер С. (2021) Постправда: знание как борьба за власть. М.: Изд-во ВШЭ, 2021.

Collins H. M., Evans R. J. (2015) Expertise Revisited. Pt. I: Interactional Expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, pt. A 54: 113–123. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1611.04423

Collins H., Evans R. (2007) Rethinking expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Collins H., Evans R. (2002) The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32 (2): 235-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032002003

Collins H. (2018) Studies of Expertise and Experience. Topoi, 37: 67–77. https://link. springer.com/article/10.1007/s11245-016-9412-1

Collins H. (2010) Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Collins H. M. et al. (2020) Experts and the Will of the People. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Fischer F. (2009) Democracy and expertise: Reorienting policy inquiry. OUP Oxford.

Fuller S. (2001) Knowledge Management Foundations. Routledge. Eyal G. (2019) The Crisis of Expertise. Polity Press.

Grundmann R., Stehr N. (2012) Experts: The knowledge and power of expertise. London: Rutledge.

Inbar D. (2020) Bash the Expert: Expertise Amid the COVID-19 Crisis Conference Summary. Institute for National Security Studies (INSS).

Jasanoff S. (2003) Breaking the Waves in Science Studies: Comment on H. M. Collins and Robert Evans, “The Third Wave of Science Studies”. Social Studies of Science, 33 (3): 389-400. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127030333004

Jasanoff S. (1990) The fifth branch: science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Latour B. (2004) Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2): 225-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.2.764

Turner S. P. (2013) The Politics of Expertise (1st ed.). Routledge.

Wynne B. (2003) Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism: Response to Collins & Evans (2002). Social Studies of Science, 33(3): 401-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127030333005

Downloads

Published

2023-07-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kalinin V.R. Studies of Expertise and Experience as a Way to Overcome the Crisis of Expert Knowledge: The Problem of Philosophical Foundations // Sociology of Power. 2023. Vol. 35, no. 4. P. 141–158. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2023-4-141-158

Коды статьи

  • EDN MLOCWF
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)