Paper Body: Bureaucratic and Legal Dimensions of the Newborn Patient's Trajectory Within Neonatal Care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2024-2-8-33Keywords:
medical organizations, health professionals, newborn patient, neonatology, bureaucracyAbstract
This article explores the bureaucratic, legal and economic dimensions of the neonatal care. Drawing analytically on the neo-Weberian approach in the sociology of professions [Freidson 2001] and the anthropology of bureaucracy in medicine [Berg 1996; Berg & Bowker 1997], we propose to analyse the medical documents and the practices of its composition as both a constitutive element of medical practice and as organisational infrastructure that ensures the coordination of different professional groups and their interactions with patients. Specifically, we define this part of the work of doctors, nursing staff and health care managers in the context of neonatal resuscitation care as a process of creating and modifying a 'paper body' for their patients, i.e. all the document flow that accompanies the processes of treating and routing the patient. Empirically, the study relies on qualitative data collected within 'the Birth of the Patient' project: diaries of included observations of a neonatal intensive care physician, ethnographic observations by social researchers, focus groups with neonatal intensive care unit staff and interviews with medical professionals and healthcare managers. As a result of this data analysis, we find that the documentary history of the newborn patient is shaped by multiple negotiations between different medical professionals and representatives of different health care institutions. In some cases, the patient's 'paper body' turns out to be a major determinant of his or her future trajectory of (de)hospitalisation. We also find that the formation of such a documentary biography of a newborn patient does not directly correlate with his or her clinical condition, but reflects the complex system of distribution of material and non-material resources that constitute the newborn care service and in some cases goes beyond it.Downloads
References
Байбурин А.К. (2017) Советский паспорт: история-структура-практики. СПб.: Изд. Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге. EDN: XMVSQP
Клепикова А., Алтухова А., Мохов С. (2023) О результатах исследования «Коммуникация между врачами, волонтерами и пациентами с БАС: проблемы и пути их решения». VIII-я ежегодная конференция по БАС фонда «Живи сейчас», Москва, 18-19 мая 2023.
Минаков А., Новкунская А., Клепикова А. (2022) Рождение пациента:(де) медикализация новорожденных в организационных контекстах неонатальной службы. Журнал исследований социальной политики, 20(2): 181-198. EDN: GUHEUI. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2022-20-2-181-198
Мансуров В.А., Юрченко О.В. (2004) Перспективы профессионализации российских врачей в реформирующемся обществе. Россия реформирующаяся, (4): 61-79. EDN: PBTJJL
Угарова А. (2018) «Сильнодействующее лекарство»: незаконное назначение наркотических обезболивающих препаратов и судебные дела над врачами, Бюллетень «ЭСФорум», 2(58): 6-12.
Чернова Ж.В. (2013) Гендерный анализ семейной политики в современной России: особенности и тенденции. Дисс. …д.соц.н. Саратов: СГТУ, 2013.
Шевченко Н. (2023) Бюрократические маршруты и документные темпоральности анкеты призывника в правозащитной организации. Антропологический форум, 59 (2023): 73-102. EDN: EYZFLW. https://doi.org/10.31250/1815-8870-2023-19-59-73-102
Berg M. (1996) Practices of reading and writing: the constitutive role of the patient record in medical work. Sociology of health & illness, 18(4): 499-524.
Berg M., Bowker G. (1997) The multiple bodies of the medical record: Toward a sociology of an artifact. Sociological Quarterly, 38(3): 513-537.
Borozdina E., Novkunskaya A. (2022) Patient-centered care in Russian maternity hospitals: Introducing a new approach through professionals’ agency. Health, 26(2): 200-220.
Borozdina E. (2018) Introducing ‘natural’ childbirth in Russian hospitals. Midwives’ institutional work. Health, technologies, and politics in post-Soviet settings: Navigating uncertainties, 145-171.
Borozdina E. (2023) Evidence-based medicine and physicians’ institutional agency in Russian clinical settings. Critical Public Health (4): 1-12.
Field M.G. (1957) Doctor and patient in Soviet Russia. Harvard University Press. Fitzpatrick S. (2005) Tear off the masks! Princeton University Press.
Freidson E. (2001) Professionalism, the third logic: On the practice of knowledge. University of Chicago press.
Goffman E. (1959) The moral career of the mental patient. Psychiatry, 22(2): 123-142.
Hull M. S. (2008). Ruled by Records: The Expropriation of Land and the Misappropriation of Lists in Islamabad. American Ethnologist, 35(4): 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2008.00095.x
Litvina D., Novkunskaya A., Temkina A. (2019) Multiple vulnerabilities in medical settings: invisible suffering of doctors. Societies, 10(1): 5. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10010005
Rivkin-Fish M. (2010). Pronatalism, gender politics, and the renewal of family support in Russia: Toward a feminist anthropology of “maternity capital”. Slavic review, 69(3): 701-724. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0037677900012201
Rosenberg C.E. (2002) The tyranny of diagnosis: specific entities and individual experience. The Milbank Quarterly, 80(2): 237-260.
Strauss A., Schatzman L., Ehrlich D., Buche, R., Sabshin M. (1963) The hospital and its negotiated order (pp. 147-169). In The hospital in modern society.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Novkunskaya A.A., Minakov A.A., Klepikova A.A.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN HQQUZR
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)