The Story of a Thing: A Frame-Analytic Perspective on a Biographical Approach to Materiality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2024-4-135-160Keywords:
biography of things/objects, frame-analysis, transposition, reframing, telephone boothAbstract
The article focuses on the integration of a frame-analytic approach into the research field of the biography of material objects, whose main representatives were originally situated in classical anthropology and archaeology. The main aim of the article is the introduction of a sociological perspective to the study of the history of things. To achieve this goal, frame analysis is used as a tool of conceptual translation, based on a synthesis of key assumptions of existing approaches. The article is divided into two parts. The primary part undertakes a review of existing biographical concepts in disciplines related to sociology. Among their shortcomings is the anthropomorphizing of the biography of an object, which leads to linearity and the desire to establish the beginning and end of its ‘life'. We argue that a thing can have ‘a number of different simultaneous lives' without specific dates. In addition, in the presented approaches, exchange appears to be the primary means of endowing an object with meaning, although it is not the only possible way. In contrast, we highlight the concept of ‘itineraries of an object' as a preferable alternative. The first part of the work also formulates the epistemic horizon of a frame-analytical biography of the material. The unit of analyzing the history of a thing - its biographical event - is the transformation of the frame of the social situation given by the object under study. In the second part of the paper, the conceptual points are illustrated by the ‘life' stories of several telephone booths: their transposition into a city Wi-Fi hotspot, their reframing into a work office, and their transposition into a complex facility at a scientific conference. It is argued that frame theory has a conceptual apparatus relevant for explaining changes in biography, which considers the relationality of meaning-making, the qualities of a thing per se, and the dispersed (as opposed to linear) nature of these changes.Downloads
References
Беньямин В. (2012) Произведение искусства в эпоху его технической воспроизводимости. Я. Охонько (ред.), Учение о подобии. Медиаэстетические произведения. Сборник статей, М.: РГГУ: 190–234. EDN: QXCRAB
Вахштайн В. С. (2006) Социология вещей и «поворот к материальному» в социальной теории. В. С. Вахштайн (ред.), Социология вещей. Сборник статей, М.: Издательский дом «Территория будущего»: 7–39. EDN: TMXXBL
Вахштайн В. С. (2013) К микросоциологии игрушек: сценарий, афорданс, транспозиция. Логос, 92(2): 3–37. EDN: RVRGZN
Вахштайн В. С. (2022) Воображая город. Введение в теорию концептуализации. М.: Новое литературное обозрение. EDN: HTGZDQ
Волкодаева И. Б., Момот С. И. (2014) Малые архитектурные формы как символы городской среды. Дизайн и технологии, 85(43): 5–14. EDN: TIQNSP
Гофман И. (2003) Анализ фреймов: эссе об организации повседневного опыта. М.: Институт социологии РАН. EDN: QOCOAX
Гофман И. (2006) Закрепление форм деятельности. В. С. Вахштайн (ред.), Социология вещей. Сборник статей, М.: Издательский дом «Территория будущего»: 54–117. EDN: TMXXGV
Дюркгейм Э. (2018) Элементарные формы религиозной жизни: тотемическая система в Австралии. М.: Элементарные формы.
Мещеркина Е. Ю. (2002) Памяти П. Бурдье. Биографическая иллюзия. Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация, 1(1): 75–84. EDN: QBKJOJ
Степанцов П. М. (2017) Семантика и прагматика архитектурного объекта: что может дать витгенштейнианский подход для изучения архитектуры. Социология власти, 29(1): 101–121. EDN: YPKVSG
Abildgaard M. S. (2019) When Doors Are Removed for Our Own Safety: The Material Semiotics of Telephone Booths. Design and Culture, 11(2): 213–236.
Alberti S. J. (2005) Objects and the museum. Isis, 96(4): 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1086/498593
Appadurai A. (1986) Introduction: commodities and the politics of value. A. Appadurai (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge University Press: 3–63.
Bauer A. A. (2019) Itinerant Objects. Annual Review of Anthropology, 48: 335–352. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011111
Blackwell M. (2007) The secret life of things: Animals, Objects, and It-narratives in Eighteenth-century England. Bucknell University Press.
Bissell D. (2010) Passenger mobilities: affective atmospheres and the sociality of public transport. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(2): 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1068/d3909
Burström N. M. (2014) Things in the Eye of the Beholder: A humanistic perspective on archaeological object biographies. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 47(1): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2014.909877
Crabtree A. (2003) Remarks on the social organisation of space and place. Homo Oeconomicus, 19: 591–605.
Cress T. (2015) Social Situations and the Impact of Things: The Example of Catholic Liturgy. Nature and Culture, 10(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2015.100307
Gosden C., Marshall Y. (1999) The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology, 31(2): 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1999.9980439
Daston L. (Ed.). (2000) Biographies of Scientific Objects. University of Chicago Press. Domanska E. (2006) Тhe Return to Things. Archaeologia Polona, 44: 171–185.
Douglas A. (1993) Britannia’s Rule and the It-Narrator. Eighteenth-Century Fiction, 6(1): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1353/ecf.1993.0057
Flanner H. (1980) Phone Booth Song. Salmagundi, 50/51: 29. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40547390
Gansky P. (2013) Privacy’s Waste Products: Touch, Contagion and Public Telephone Design. Journal of Design History, 27(2): 132–147.
Harding A. (2016) Introduction: Biographies of Things. Distant Worlds Journal, 1(1): 5–10. https://doi.org/10.11588/dwj.2016.1.30158
Holtorf C. J. (1998) The Life-Histories of Megaliths in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany). World Archaeology, 30(1): 23–38. DOI: http://www.jstor.org/stable/125007
Holtorf C. (2002) Notes on the Life History of a Pot Sherd. Journal of Material Culture, 7(1): 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183502007001305
Hoskins J. (1998) Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of People’s Lives. Routledge.
Ingold T. (2007) Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues, 14(1): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1380203807002127
Joy J. (2009) Reinvigorating object biography: reproducing the drama of object lives. World Archaeology, 41(4): 540–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438240903345530
Joyce R. A., Gillespie S. D. (2015) Things in Motion: Object Itineraries in Anthropological Practice. Sch. Adv. Res. Press.
Kopytoff I. (1986) The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process. A. Appadurai (ed.), The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge University Press: 64–92.
McCormack D. P. (2008) Engineering affective atmospheres on the moving geographies of the 1897 Andrée expedition. Cultural Geographies, 15(4): 413–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474008094314
Mauss M. (2002) The gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Routledge.
Meskell L. (2021) Object worlds in Ancient Egypt: Material Biographies Past and Present. Routledge.
Swander M. (1992) Amish Phone Booth. The Kenyon Review, 14(4): 161–162. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4336778
Thomas N. (2009) Entangled objects: Exchange, Material Culture, and Colonialism in the Pacific. Harvard University Press.
York J. (2002) The life cycle of bronze age metalwork from the Thames. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 21(1): 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0092.00150
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Semovskikh U.S., Davletov D.R.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN KOMVPM
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)