Middle-Range Operators: The Sociology of Uncertainty as a Gestalt Theorem
Keywords:
uncertainty, invention, crisis, social ties, institutionsAbstract
This article proposes a conceptualization of middle-range operators - a class of social phenomena insufficiently described in contemporary social theory yet playing a central role in enabling sociological theorization of uncertainty. The analysis critically examines reflexive sociology’s limitations in addressing uncertainty, particularly the “dual hysteresis problem” in Pierre Bourdieu’s crisis theory, which obstructs linkages between micro- and macro-level social realities in contexts of change. This impasse necessitates recourse to reflexive sociology’s peripheral conceptual tools: “inventions” or, more broadly, middle-range operators. Through case studies of Gisèle Sapiro’s “axiological operators” and Nathan Marom’s “spatial distinctions”, the text demonstrates how contemporary reflexive sociology identifies concepts and phenomena structurally fulfilling middle-range operator functions in specific contexts, while neglecting broader systemic characterization of this social category. To address this gap, the analysis engages with modern debates on (quasi)institutional preconditions and effects of social network dynamics, drawing particularly on guanxi scholarship. The concluding sectionoutlines defining characteristics of middle-range operators and introduces the concept of modulation - a theoretical lens revealing previously overlooked processes of resource transformation and recalibration enacted by social actors during structural crises and rapid societal transformations.Agencies
Я благодарю Алину Лихачевскую, Марию Волкову и Сабину Балишян за обсуждение черновых версий этого текста, а также участников курса «Социология риска и неопределенности», прочитанного мной в Шанинке весной 2024 года, на котором были сформированы первые гипотезы и идеи, которые легли в основу этой статьи.Downloads
References
Бурдье П. (2018). Homo Academicus. М.: Издательство Института Гайдара. EDN: HDSZPD
Волкова М. Д. (2021). Шаманы, чиновники и их космологии: местные религиозные организации Бурятии и Иркутской области. Антропологический форум, 51, c. 39–71. EDN: AYMZWF. https://doi.org/10.31250/1815-8870-2021-17-51-39-71
Волкова М. Д. (2025) Групповые стили как операторы среднего уровня: ситуативные инновации в шаманских организациях. Социология власти, 37 (2), с. 32-46.
Грановеттер М. (2009). Сила слабых связей. Экономическая социология, 10(4), c. 31–50. EDN: OYNYKJ
Козлов С. В. (2025). Бурдье + Симондон = Чернобыль: набросок общей теории (социальных) изобретений. Логос, 35(4) (в печати).
Козлов С. В. (2024). Техники дрессировки фантазии и стратегии эвфемизации советской бюрократии после Чернобыльской аварии: Саркофаги, пьесы, заключения и отчеты. Логос, 34(4), c. 68–80. EDN: JJZEVJ. https://doi.org/10.17323/0869-5377-2024-4-68-80
Константиновский Д. Л., Вахштайн В. С.*, Куракин Д. Ю. (2012). К анализу дотеоретических оснований социологии образования: экспликация базовых метафор. Вопросы образования, 4, c. 22–39. EDN: PVJFPT.
Куракин Д. Ю. (2023). Катектические механизмы культуры. Часть 1. Социологическое обозрение, 22(3), c. 9–52. EDN: YTIUBS. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2023-3-9-52
Куракин Д. Ю. (2024). Катектические механизмы культуры. Часть 2. Социологическое обозрение, 23(1), c. 9–39. EDN: CXVVPN
Латур Б. (2014). Об интеробъективности. Социологическое обозрение, 13(2), c. 113–162. EDN: JWURYH
Филиппов А.Ф.(2004). К теории социальных событий. Логос,5, c.3–28. EDN: XESKUT
Alexander J. C. (2018). The societalization of social problems: Church pedophilia, phone hacking, and the financial crisis. American Sociological Review, 83(6), pp. 1049–1078. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418803376
Barbalet J. (2023). Conceptualising informal institutions: Drawing on the case of guanxi. The British Journal of Sociology, 74(1), pp. 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12984
Bech J. M. (2021). Spinoza’s conatus undoes Bourdieu’s habitus. Conatus — Journal of Philosophy, 6(2), pp. 131–152. https://doi.org/10.12681/cjp.25632
Bian Y. (1997). Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62(3), pp. 366–385. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2307/2657311
Bian Y. (2019). Guanxi: How China works. Polity.
Bonnin M. (2013). The lostgeneration: The rustication of China’s educated youth (1968–1980). Chinese University Press.
Bourdieu P. (1962). The Algerians. Beacon Press.
Bourdieu P. (1996). The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power. Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu P. (2000). Pascalian meditations (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford University Press. Bourdieu P., & Passeron J.-C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Sage Publications.
Bourdieu P., & Sayad A. (1964). Le déracinement. La crise de l’agriculture traditionnelle en Algérie. Minuit.
Calabretta A. (2022). Transnational fields under change. Investigating the impacts of the Tunisian Revolution on the transnational political field. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 2022(2), pp. 467–491. https://doi.org/10.1423/104936
Caselli D. (2022). Heteronomy reloaded. Tensions and transformation in the field of welfare expertise in post-2008 crisis. The case of Milan, Italy. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 2022(2), pp. 407–433. https://doi.org/10.1423/104934
Ermakoff I. (2013). Rational choice may take over. In P. S. Gorski (Ed.), Bourdieu and historical analysis (pp. 89–107). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395430-005
Gold T. B. (2017). Normalizing private business in China. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 22(3), pp. 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-017-9509-4
Gorski P. S. (2013). Bourdieu as a theorist of change. In P. S. Gorski (Ed.), Bourdieu and historical analysis (pp. 1–15). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395430-001
Granovetter M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), pp. 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
Granovetter M. (1995). Getting a job: A study ofcontacts and careers. University of Chicago Press.
Hacking I. (1995). The social construction of what? Harvard University Press.
Kennedy J. M. (1974). A psychology of picture perception: Images and information. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Lin N. (2001). Guanxi: A conceptual analysis. In A. Y. So, N. Lin, & D. Poston (Eds.), The Chinese triangle of mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong (pp. 153–166). Greenwood Press.
Marom N. (2014). Relating a city’s history and geography with Bourdieu: One hundred years of spatial distinction in Tel Aviv. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(4), pp. 1344–1362. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12027
Rubin E. (1958). Figure and ground. In D. C. Beardslee, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Readings in perception (pp. 194–203). D. Van Nostrand.
Sapiro G. (2020). The transnational literary field between (inter)-nationalism and cosmopolitanism. Journal of World Literature, 5(4), pp. 481–504. https://dx.doi.org/10.1163/24056480-00504002
Sapiro G (2022). Structural crises vs. situations of (political) crisis. Rassegna italiana di Sociologia, LXIII (2), pp.299-321. https://dx.doi.org/10.1423/104930
Sapiro G. (2023). Against self-interest: The codification of „disinterestedness” as an axiological operator in religion, aesthetics, and law. In S. Geroulanos & G. Sapiro (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the history and sociology of ideas (pp. 256–274). Routledge.
Simondon G. (2020). Allagmatics. In G. Simondon, Individuation in light of notions of form and information (pp. 661–671). University of Minnesota Press.
Strand M., & Lizardo O. (2017). The hysteresis effect: Theorizing mismatch in action. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 47(2), pp. 164–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12117
Wang Y. (2016). Homology and isomorphism: Bourdieu in conversation with new institutionalism. The British Journal of Sociology, 67(2), pp. 348–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12197
Yakubovich V. (2005). Weak ties, information, and influence: How workers find jobs in a local Russian labor market. American Sociological Review, 70(3), pp. 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000303
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kozlov S.V.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
Коды статьи
- EDN CUIMIM
- Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)