Discrete Present, Continuous past, and Active Future of the Labor Market in Khakassia

Authors

Keywords:

labour market, labour force, staff shortage, subjectivity paradox

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of perceptions of the labor market by employers and civil servants responsible for solving personnel problems in the region. Based on the reconstruction of the narrative within expert interviews conducted in 2024 in the Republic of Khakassia, three components of the conversation about the personnel shortage are identified: discrete present, continuous past, and active future. The discrete present describes the situation of personnel shortage, which is recognized by all informants; the continuous past reveals the complex of reasons that caused the shortage; the active future contains forecasts and sets of necessary actions to overcome it. It is concluded that one of the most urgent solutions is the normative consolidation of space for economic entities and government officials at the regional level to implement their actorship. Only by encouraging the initiative of regional actors in developing solutions to personnel problems, the criticality of incoming orders, autonomy in their implementation while maintaining responsibility does it become possible to take into account regional specifics and most effectively adapt general directives to local conditions. Interviews with regional employees reflect their agentic perception by federal officials, who often treat regional officials exclusively as executors - but not as equal colleagues capable and willing to use knowledge of the regional context to adjust unified directives coming from above. In reality, we observe a constant alternation of the modes of “agency” and “actorship” among the same leaders, and it is the proactive activity of regional officials in developing measures of state support for employers and personnel policy, adaptation, and nuanced orders depending on regional specifics that becomes the key to their success.

Agencies

Статья подготовлена в рамках выполнения научно-исследовательской работы государственного задания РАНХиГС.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • D.M. Rogozin, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

    Dmitry M. Rogozin — Candidate of Sociological Sciences, Head of the Laboratory for Field Research, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of Russian Federation (RANEPA); Chief Researcher, Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

    Moscow

  • A.A. Chentsova, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

    Alexandra A. Chentsova — Junior Researcher, the Laboratory for Field Research, Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of Russian Federation (RANEPA).

    Moscow

References

Аксёнова О. В. (2023). Диалектика социального действия. К методологии изучения трансформации субъектности. М. К. Горшков (Ред.), Россия реформирующаяся: ежегодник. Вып. 21 (с. 122–149). ФНИСЦ РАН. EDN: ZMVQYE. https://doi.org/10.19181/ezheg.2023.5

Балацюк Е. С., Кресникова Е. В. (2024). Трудовые ценности в поколенческом аспекте на примере младших миллениалов Санкт-Петербурга. Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация, 16(2): 50–68. EDN: DAZQVK. https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2024.16.2.3

Веселкова Н. В., Прямикова Е. В. (2024). Состояние постиндустриальности: «власть заводов». Интеракция. Интервью. Интерпретация, 16(3): 10–32. EDN: SZLGZM. https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2024.16.3.1

Зоидов К. Х., Урунов А.А., Богатырев С.И., Остапенко В.А. (2024). Дефицит кадров: сравнительный анализ в России и зарубежных странах. Региональные проблемы преобразования экономики, 6: 164–172. EDN: JBMTDG. https://doi.org/10.26726/1812-7096-2024-6-164-172

Рогозин Д. М. (2021). Дистанционное обучение в период пандемии COVID-19: Методология административного опроса преподавателей и студентов вузов. Издательский дом «Дело» РАНХиГС. EDN: VSNUSS

Селиверстова Н. С. (2024) Структурные сдвиги в электронной промышленности. Экономика промышленности, 17(1): 67–75. EDN: HIWYRS. https://doi.org/10.17073/2072-1633-2024-1-1255

Сизова И. Л., Орлова Н. С., Елагина Е. Д. (2023). Компетентность работников в условиях социально-экономической неопределенности. Социологический журнал, 29 (4): 31–55. EDN: GNOOWE. https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2023.29.4.2

Соловьев А. И. (2024). Агенты и механизмы политического господства, или Как правит «выигрышная» коалиция. Политические исследования, 2: 96–117. EDN: CGFBMG. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.02.08

Темницкий А. Л. (2022). Роль ценностей самоутверждения в достижении благополучия у российских работников. Социологический журнал, 28(1): 61–79. EDN: FZSTWK. https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2022.28.1.8838

Чекмарев О. П., Ильвес А. Л., Конев П. А. (2023). Занятость и дефицит кадров в России в условиях санкционного давления: факторный анализ предложения труда. Экономика труда, 10(4): 475–496. EDN: LYUOEK. https://doi.org/10.18334/et.10.4.117602

Энтин М. Л., Энтина Е. Г., Давранова С. Б., Наджаров А. М. (2024). Теоретико-методологические аспекты изучения санкционной политики Запада. Политические исследования, 1: 21–36. EDN: LRCOGX. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.01.02

Chinorachy R., Corejova T. (2019) Impact of digital technologies on labor market and the transport sector. Transportation Research Procedia, 40: 994–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.139

Ermakoff I. (2015). The Structure of Contingency. American Journal of Sociology, 121(1): 64–125. https://doi.org/10.1086/682026

Evangelista R., Guerrieri P., Meliciani V. (2014). The economic impact of digital technologies in Europe. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 23(8): 802–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2014.918438

Gaur A., Settles A., Vaatanen J. (2023). Do economic sanctions work? Evidence from the Russian-Ukraine conflict. Journal of Management studies, 60 (6): 1391–1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12933

Gerber T. P., & Gimpelson V. (2024). Inequality and social stratification in Russia during the Putin regime: From market transition to war on Ukraine. Sociology Compass, 18(3): e13196. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13196

Maslova V. V., Zaruk N. F., & Avdeev M. V. (2024). Accumulation and Consumption in the Agricultural Sector of the Russian Economy. In E. G. Popkova, A. V. Bogoviz, B. S. Sergi, O. V. Kaurova, & A. N. Maloletko (Eds.), Sustainable Development of the Agrarian Economy Based on Digital Technologies and Smart Innovations. Springer Nature Switzerland: 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51272-8_2

Bitzinger R. A., Raska M. (2022). Chinese and Russian military modernization and the fourth Industrial revolution. In S. Kirchberger, S. Sinjen, N. Wormer (Ed.) Russia-China relations: Emerging alliance or eternal rivals? Springer: 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-97012-3

Tavokin E. P. (2024) About the personnel problem in modern Russia. Human Resources Management and Services, 6(3): 3485. https://doi.org/10.18282/hrms.v6i3.3485

Downloads

Published

2025-03-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Rogozin D., Chentsova A. Discrete Present, Continuous past, and Active Future of the Labor Market in Khakassia // Sociology of Power. 2025. Vol. 37, no. 2. P. 157–186.

Коды статьи

  • EDN OHWWOJ
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)