Дом науки: жизнь и времена тропических и полярных полевых станций

Авторы

  • Пол Венцель Гейсслер Университет Осло Автор
  • Энн Х. Келли Департамент глобального здравоохранения и социальной медицины, Королевский колледж Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-3-272-297

Ключевые слова:

эстетика, аффект, домашняя жизнь, полевые станции, полевая работа, полярный/тропический, постколониальность

Аннотация

Полевой стационар, являясь переходным пунктом между унифицированным и очищенным пространством лаборатории и многообразными и уникальными пространствами «поля», представляет собой контролируемое, но четко не очерченное место, где можно получить доступ к природе и к ней «прикрепиться». Будучи жильем для приезжих ученых, полевые станции включены как в рутину и ритм повседневной жизни, так и в долгие циклы проживания, ветшания и восстановления. В этой статье рассматривается эмпирическое и концептуальное значения полевых станций в тропических и полярных широтах в качестве мест для научной работы и жизни ученых. Экстерриториальный, но в то же время домашний характер полевой станции влияет на достоверность знаний и их распространение вдоль фронтира науки. Задача создания дома в экстремальном поле, повседневный опыт экспатриации и апроприации определяют особую политическую динамику производства знания в этих местах. Обращаясь к полевым станциям, мы фокусируем внимание на образах природы и науки, которые питают транснациональные исследования и раскрывают эстетические и эмоциональные аспекты работы и жизни в этих далеких домах науки.

Скачивания

Данные по скачиваниям пока не доступны.

Библиографические ссылки

Alcayna-Stevens L. (2016) Habituating field scientists. Social Studies of Science, 46 (6): 833-853.

Anderson D. G., Berglund E. (2002) Ethnographies of Conservation: Environmentalism and the Distribution of Privilege, Oxford: Berghahn Press.

Anderson D. G., Nuttall M. (2003) Cultivating Arctic Landscapes: Knowing and Managing Animals in the Circumpolar North, Oxford: Berghahn Press.

Anderson W. (2009) From subjugated knowledge to conjugated subjects: Science and globalisation, or postcolonial studies of science? Postcolonial Studies, 12 (4): 389-400

Benson K. (2009) Field stations and surveys. P. J. Bowler, J. V. Pickstone (eds) The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 6, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 76-89

Bodenhorn B. (2012) Meeting minds; encountering worlds: Sciences and other expertises on the North Slope of Alaska. M.Konrad (ed.) Collaborators Collaborating: Counterparts in Anthropological Knowledge and International Research Relations, New York: Berghahn Press: 225-244

Bravo M., Rees G. (2006) Cryo-politics: Environmental security and the future of Arctic navigation. Brown Journal of World Affairs,13 (1): 205-215.

Bravo M., Sorlin S. (2002) Narrating the Arctic: A Cultural History of Nordic Scientific Practices, Canton, OH: Science History Publications.

Campbell M. B. (1999) Wonder and Science: Imagining Worlds in Early Modern Europe, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Candea M. (2010) 'I fell in love with Carlos the meerkat': Engagement and detachment in human animal relations. American Ethnologist, 37 (2): 241-258.

Cannon S. F. (1978) Science in Culture: The Early Victorian Period, Folkestone: Dawson Publishing.

Carter P. (2010 [1987]) The Road to Botany Bay: An Exploration of Landscape and History, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Crane J. (2011) Scrambling for Africa? Universities and global health. The Lancet, 377 (9775): 1388-1390.

Crate S. A., Nuttall M. N. (2009) Anthropology and Climate Change: From Encounters to Actions, Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

Cunningham A., Jardine N. (eds) (1990) Romanticism and the Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Daston L., Lunbeck E. (eds) (2011) Histories of Scientific Observation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Didur J. (2013) Guns & Roses: Reading the picturesque archive in Anita Desai's Fire on the Mountain. Textual Practice, 27 (3): 499-522.

Droney D. (2014) Ironies of laboratory work during Ghana's second age of optimism. Cultural Anthropology, 29 (2): 363-384.

Fairhead J., Leach M. (1996) Misreading the African landscape: Society and Ecology in a Forest-Savannah Mosaic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fairhead J., Leach M., Small M. (2006) Where techno-science meets poverty: Medical research and the economy of blood in The Gambia, West Africa. Social Science & Medicine, 63 (4): 1109-1120.

Galison P., Thompson E. (1999) The Architecture of Science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Geissler P. W. (2015) What future remains? Remembering an African place of science. P. W. Geissler (ed.) Para-States and Medical Science: Making Global Health in Africa, Durham, NC: Duke University Press: 142-178.

Geissler P. W., Kelly A. (2016) Field station as stage: Reenacting scientific work and life in Amani, Tanzania. Social Studies of Science, 46 (6): 912-937.

Geissler P. W., Molyneux S. (2011) Evidence, Ethos and Experiment: The Anthropology and History of Medical Research in Africa, Oxford: Berghahn Press.

Geissler P. W., Lachenal G., Manton J. et al. (2016) Traces of the Future: An Archaeology of Medical Science in Twenty First Century Africa, Bristol: Intellect.

Graboyes M. (2015) The Experiment Must Continue: Medical Research and Ethics in East Africa, 1940-2014, Athens: Ohio University Press.

Hastrup K. (2013a) Andaman Islanders and Polar Eskimos: Emergent ethnographic subjects c. 1900. Journal of the British Academy, 1: 3-30.

Hastrup K. (2013b) Scales of attention in fieldwork: Global connections and local concerns in the Arctic. Ethnography, 14 (2): 145-164.

Heggie V. (2014) Why isn't exploration a science? Isis, 105 (2): 318-334.

Heggie V. (2016) Higher and colder: The success and failure of boundaries in high altitude and Antarctic research stations. Social Studies of Science, 46 (6): 809-832.

Henke C. R., Gieryn T. F. (2008) Sites of scientific practice: The enduring importance of place. E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska M. Lynch et al. (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 353-376.

Herzig R. M. (2005) Suffering for Science: Reason and Sacrifice in Modern America, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Kelly A. H. (2012) The experimental hut: Hosting vectors. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18: 145-160.

Kelly A. H. (2016) Seeing cellular debris, remembering a Soviet method. Visual Anthropology, 29 (2): 133-158.

Kelly A. H., Geissler P. W. (2011) The value of transnational medical research. Journal of Cultural Economy, 4 (1): 3-10.

Kohler R. E. (2002) Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Lab-Field Border in Biology

Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Kuklick H., Kohler R. E. (1996) Introduction: Science in the field. Osiris, 11:1-14. 295 Lachenal G. (2016) At home in the postcolony: Ecology, empire and domesticity at the Lamto field station, Ivory Coast. Social Studies of Science, 877-893.

Larsen E. J. (2011) An Empire of Ice: Scott, Shackleton, and the Heroic Age of Antarctic Science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Latour B., Woolgar S. (1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd ed., Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Livingstone D. N. (2010) Putting Science in its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge

Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Lynch M. (1991) Laboratory space and the technological complex: An investigation of topical contextures. Science in Context, 4 (1): 51-78.

Martin E. (2013) The potentiality of ethnography and the limits of affect theory. Current Anthropology, 54 (S7): 149-158.

Massey D. (2004) Geographies of responsibility. Geograflska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 86 (1): 5-18.

Mitchell W. T. (2002) Landscape and Power, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Mitman G. (1996) When nature is the zoo: Vision and power in the art and science of natural history. Osiris, 11: 117-143.

Moyi Okwaro F., Geissler P. W. (2015) In/dependent collaborations: Perceptions and experiences of African scientists in transnational HIV research. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 29 (4): 492-511.

Myers N. (2008) Molecular embodiments and the body-work of modeling in protein crystallography. Social Studies of Science, 38 (2): 163-199.

Nielsen K. H., Harbsmeier M., Ries C. (2012) Scientists and Scholars in the Field: Studies in the History of Fieldwork and Expeditions, Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.

O'Reilly J. (2016) Sensing the ice: Field science, models, and expert intimacy with knowledge. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 22 (S1): 27-45.

Oreskes N. (1996) Objectivity or heroism? On the invisibility of women in science.

Osiris, 11: 87-113.

Palsson G., Hujbens E.H. (2009) The bog in our brain and bowels: The social attitudes to the cartography of Icelandic wetlands. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 21: 296-316.

Pearson M. (2004) 'No joke in in petticoats': British Polar expeditions and their theatrical presentations. TDR, 48 (1): 44-59.

Pollock A. (2014) Places of pharmaceutical knowledge-making: Global health, postcolonial science, and hope in South African drug discovery. Social Studies of Science,44 (6): 848-873.

Raj K. (2007) Relocating Modern Science: Circulation and the Construction of Knowledge in South Asia and Europe, 1650-1900, London: Palgrave MacMillan.

Redfield P. (2000) Space in the Tropics: From Convicts to Rockets in French Guiana, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Redfield P. (2002) The half-life of empire in outer space. Social Studies of Science, 32 (5-6): 791-825.

Roberts P., Paglia E. (2016) Science as national belonging: The construction of Svalbard as a Norwegian space. Social Studies of Science, 46 (6): 894-911.

Schaffer S. (1994) From Physics to Anthropology - And Back Again, Cambridge: Prickly Pear Press.

Schaffer S. (1997) Metrology, metrication, and Victorian values. B. Lightman (ed.)

Victorian Science in Context, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press: 438-474.

Schubel J. R. (2015) Some thoughts on keeping field stations and marine labs afloat in turbulenttimes. BioScience, 65 (5): 458-459.

Schumaker L. (2001) Africanizing Anthropology: Fieldwork, Networks, and the Making of Cultural Knowledge in Central Africa, Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press.

Seth S. (2009) Putting knowledge in its place: Science, colonialism, and the postcolonial. Postcolonial Studies, 12 (4): 373-388.

Shapin S. (1988) The house of experiment in seventeenth century England. Isis, 79 (3): 373-404.

Skrydstrup M. (2016) Of spheres and squares: Can Sloterdijk help us rethink the architecture of climate science? Social Studies of Science, 46 (6): 854-876.

Spufford F. (2010) I May Be Some Time, London: Faber & Faber.

Street A. (2016) The hospital and the hospital: Infrastructure, human tissue, labour and the scientific production of relational value. Social Studies of Science, 46 (6): 938960.

Tilley H. (2011) Africa as a Living Laboratory: Empire, Development, and the Problem of Scientific Knowledge, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Загрузки

Опубликован

2021-05-15

Выпуск

Раздел

Статьи

Как цитировать

Гейсслер П.В., Келли Э.Х. Дом науки: жизнь и времена тропических и полярных полевых станций // Социология власти. 2021. Т. 33, № 3. С. 282–297. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2021-3-272-297

Коды статьи

  • EDN XQPFZK
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)