Anthropotechnomorphisms and the Anthropology of Techno-Corpo-Reality

Authors

  • Sergei V. Sokolovskiy Институт этнологии и антропологии РАН , Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2017-3-23-40

Keywords:

body, morph, human evolution, Techno-Corpo-Reality, anthropotechnomorphism, human extensions

Abstract

Edward Hall's idea of human extensions and Gregory Bateson's view on the fundamental evolutionary unit as a combination of the organism and its milieu are used in treatment of human evolution as co-evolution of Man and environment, both natural and artificial. The concept of technics is used as hybrid entity, comprising somatic and extra-somatic elements, or body technics and their co-extensive non-organic artefacts, or extensions. The author introduces the concepts of anthropotechnomorphism and Techno-Corpo-Reality, serving as foci for the study of co-evolution 24 of human body and its technical milieu in anthropology thus suggesting new research perspective for ecological, evolutionary, cultural, and bioanthropology. The paper suggests a critical view on reductive character of most current theories of human evolution and somatic differentiation, which underscore geographical and biological factors by simultaneously understating the roles of corporeal and extra-corporeal technics and hybrid nature of the evolving anthropotechnomorphic entities. The problems of body boundaries and its identity over time are considered within Marshall McLuhan's mereological perspective of “innering” and “outering”. It is argued that the perception of certain human extensions or enhancements as intra- and exosomatic is inherent in the issue of somatic identity persistence. Finally, ontopluralistic metaphysics, suggested by Annemarie Mol's treatment of atherosclerosis in her “Body Multiple”, is contrasted with scientific realist version of a single nosological unit, differently constructed by radiologists, surgeons, or haematologists as various technomorphic assemblies that all pertain to a single diagnosis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bateson G. (1987 ) Steps to Ecology of Mind, London: Jason Aronson Inc.

Bourdieu P. (1979) La Distinction: critique sociale du jugement, Paris: Minuit.

Canguilhem G. (2008 ) Knowledge of Life, N.Y.: Fordham Univ. Press.

Ellul J. (1954) La Technique ou l'enjeu du siècle, Paris: Armand Colin.

Gilliard T.E. (1963) The Evolution of Bowerbirds. Scientific American, 209: 38-46 Hall E.T. (1989 ) Beyond Culture, N.Y.: Anchor Books.

Heidegger M. (1954) Die Frage nach der Technik. Die Künste im technischer Zeitalter, München: 70-108.

Kusmierski R., Borgia G., Crazier R.H., Chan B.H.Y. (1993) Molecular information on bowerbird phylogeny and the evolution of exaggerated male characteristics. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 6: 737-752.

Law J., Singleton V. (2003) Object Lessons, Lancaster: Lancaster University (http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Law-Singleton-Object-Lessons.pdf). Lemonnier P. (1992) Elements for an Anthropology of Technology, Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan.

Leroi-Gourhan A. (1943) Evolution et techniques. Vol. I. L'Homme et la matière, Paris. Leroi-Gourhan A. (1945) Evolution et techniques. Vol. II. Milieu et techniques, Paris. Mauss M. (1936 ) Les techniques du corps. Journal de Psychologie, XXXII (3-4) (http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/mauss_marcel/socio_et_anthropo/6_Techniques_corps/techniques_corps.pdf).

McLuhan M. (1978) The Brain and the Media: the Western Hemisphere. Journal of Communication, 28: 54-60.

Merleau-Ponty M. (1945) Phénoménologie de la Perception, Paris: Gallimard.

Mol A. (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice, Durham: Duke Univ. Press. Mumford L. (1934) Technics and Civilization, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Rapp F. (1987) Perspektiven einer Philosophie der Technik. Revue International de Philosophie, 41:171-183.

Rogers E.M. (2000) The Extensions of Men: The Correspondence of Marshall McLuhan

and Edward T. Hall. Mass Communication & Society, 3 (1): 117-135.

Sparrow T., Hutchinson A. (eds) (2013) A History of Habit from Aristotle to Bourdieu, Lanham: Lexington Books.

Stiegler B. (1994, 1996) La Technique et le temps. Vol. 1-2, Paris: Editions Galilée.

Venn J. (1866) The Logic of Chance, London: Macmillan.

Wacquant L. (2011) Habitus as Topic and Tool: Reflections on Becoming a Prizefighter. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8: 81-92.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sokolovskiy S.V. Anthropotechnomorphisms and the Anthropology of Techno-Corpo-Reality // Sociology of Power. 2017. Vol. 29, no. 3. P. 23–40. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2017-3-23-40

Коды статьи

  • EDN YTPUHG
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)