Transformations of the Political Imaginary in Post-Soviet Central Asia: The Cases of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan

Authors

  • Vladimir Sergeevich Malakhov RANEPA Автор https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0154-5785 (unauthenticated)
  • Nina Aronovna Bagdasarova American University of Central Asia Автор
  • Gulnara Kubanychbekovna Ibrayeva PIL Research Company (Кыргызстан) Автор
  • Saodat Kuzievna Olimova Research Center "SHARK" (ORIENS) Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2023-1-160-189

Keywords:

political imaginary, national identity, sovereignty, central Asia, Kyrgyzstan, tajikistan, russia

Abstract

The paper examines the structure and dynamics of the political imaginary of the two countries of post-Soviet Central Asia Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. As the authors show, Russia has a special place in this structure. For a long time, many ordinary citizens of these states did not perceive Russia as a foreign state on an equal footing with others. This perception was due to a number of factors, the most important of which was Soviet institutional and psychological inertia. At the institutional level, Soviet inertia was expressed primarily in the transparency of the borders between Russia and the Central Asian countries. On a psychological level, it manifested itself in nostalgia for the Soviet past. It was the overlapping of soviet nostalgia with the understanding of the importance of migration to Russia for the material well-being of households that gave rise to a high level of loyalty to Moscow. Recently, however, the Russian Federation has started to gradually become a foreign state among others in the eyes of ordinary residents of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. In the minds of people, Russia still has a specific status, but this specificity is increasingly seen in a global context; in this context, other actors along with Moscow matter (Beijing and Washington, as well as Istanbul and Tehran). The process of turning Russia into an ordinary "abroad" was going on before, but it accelerated sharply after February 24, 2022. The authors identify signs of distancing from Russia both at the level of the ruling elites and at the level of civil society. Among these signs are, in particular, the desire of governments to demonstrate a multi-vector foreign policy, a change in the public rhetoric of top officials, as well as manifestations of anti-Russian sentiment in the public sphere of Kyrgyzstan.

Agencies

Статья подготовлена в рамках выполнения научно-исследовательской работы государственного задания РАНХиГС.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Vladimir Sergeevich Malakhov, RANEPA

    Vladimir S. Malakhov— Dr. of Sciences (Political Science), professor, School for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, Institute for Social Sciences RANEPA.

    Moscow

  • Nina Aronovna Bagdasarova, American University of Central Asia

    Nina A. Bagdasarova — PhD in Psychology, Professor of the Department of Psychology at the American University of Central Asia.

    Bishkek

  • Gulnara Kubanychbekovna Ibrayeva, PIL Research Company (Кыргызстан)

    Gulnara K. Ibrayeva — PhD in Sociology, Founder of PIL Research Company.

    Bishkek

  • Saodat Kuzievna Olimova, Research Center "SHARK" (ORIENS)

    Saodat K. Olimova — Candidate of Philosophy, Director of the Research Center “SHARK” (ORIENS).

    Dushanbe

References

Абашин С. (2011) Нации и постколониализм в Центральной Азии двадцать лет спустя: переосмысливая категории анализа. Ab imperio, 3: 193-210.

Абашин С. Н. (2007) Национализмы в Средней Азии: в поисках идентичности, М.: СПб.: Алетейя.

Аренас И., Дзеновска Д. (2010) Делать «народ». Политическое воображаемое и материальность баррикад в Мексике и Латвии. Laboratorium: Журнал социальных исследований, 2: 399-402.

Быстрова Я. В., Дудник С. И. (2019) Политическое воображаемое в эпоху сталинской модернизации. Конфликтология, 14(3): 84-94.

Горшенина С. (2007) Извечна ли маргинальность русского колониального Туркестана, или Войдет ли постсоветская Средняя Азия в область post-исследований? Ab imperio, 2: 209-258.

Горшенина С. М. (2019) Изобретение концепта Средней/Центральной Азии: между наукой и гeoполитикой / Пер. с фр. М. Р. Майзульса. Вашингтон: Программа изучения Центральной Азии, Университет Джорджа Вашингтона.

Малашенко А., Колесников А. (2012) Постсоветского пространства не существует. Московский центр Карнеги. URL: https://carnegiemoscow.org/2012/06/08/ru-pub-48498 (дата обращения: 03.02.2022).

Малинова О. Ю. (2010) Символическая политика и конструирование макрополитической идентичности в постсоветской России. ПОЛИС: Политические исследования, 2: 90-105.

Малинова О. Ю. (2016) Официальный исторический нарратив как элемент политики идентичности в России: от 1990-х к 2000-м годам. ПОЛИС: Политические исследования, 6: 139-158.

Моррисон А. (2017). Центральная Азия: «Великий шелковый путь» и «Большая игра» — лишь мифы, далекие от реальности. URL: https://russian.eurasianet.org/node/64596/

Нойманн И. (2004) Использование другого. Образы Востока в формировании европейских идентичностей, М.: Новое издательство.

Олимова О., Олимов М. (1999) Таджикистан на пороге перемен, М.: Центр стратегических и политических исследований, Научно-аналитический центр «Шарк».

Ремнев А. (2011) Колониальность, постколониальность и «историческая политика» в современном Казахстане. Ab Imperio, 1: 169-205.

Семененко И. С. (2011) Политическая идентичность в контексте политики идентичности. ПОЛИТЭКС, 7(2): 5-24.

Тимофеев И. Н. (2010) Российская политическая идентичность сквозь призму интерпретации истории. Вестник МГИМО-Университета, 3 (12): 51-59.

Abashin S. (2015) Soviet Central Asia on the Periphery. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 16(2): 359-374.

Allison R. (2004) Regionalism, regional structure and security management. International Affairs, 80(3): 463-483.

Atkin M. (2011) Tajikistan: from de facto colony to sovereign dependency. Sally N. Cummings, Raymond Hinnebusch (eds) Sovereignty After Empire: Comparing Middle East and Central Asia. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.

Cole J., Kandiyoti D. (2002) Nationalism and the Colonial Legacy in the Middle East and Central Asia: Introduction. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 34: 189-203.

De Haas M. (2016) Security policy and developments in Central Asia: Security documents compared with security challenges. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies, 29 (2): 203-226.

Gleason A. (2010) Eurasia: What is it? Is it? Journal of Eurasian Studies, 1(1): 26-32.

Heathershaw J., Herzig E. (eds) (2012) The Transformation of Tajikistan: the Sources of Statehood, L.: Routledge.

Heathershaw J. (2011) Tajikistan amidst globalization: state failure or state transformation? Central Asian Survey, 30 (1): 147-168.

Ibabez-Tirado D. (2015) How can I be post Soviet if I was never Soviet? Central Asian Survey, 34 (2): 190-203.

Laruelle M. (2018) (ed.) Tajikistan on the Move: State-Building and Societal Transformations, Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Lexington Books, 2018.

Laruelle M. 2021. Central Peripheries: Nationhood in Central Asia, L.: UCLpress.

Laruelle M., Royce D. (2020) No Great Game: Central Asia’s Public Opinion on Russia, China and the US. Kennan Cable, 56. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/media/uploads/documents/KI_200805_cable%2056_final.pdf (дата обращения: 11.03.2023).

Liu M. Y. (2011) Central Asia in the Post-Cold War World. Annual Review of Anthropology, 40: 115-131.

Patnaik A. (2016) Central Asia: Geopolitics, Security, Stability, L.: Routledge.

Peimani H. (2009) Conflict and Security in Central Asia and Caucasus, Santa Barbara, Califf.: ABC-CLIO.

Sahadeo J. (2012) Soviet “Blacks” and Place Making in Leningrad and Moscow. Slavic Review, 71(2): 331-358.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Malakhov V.S., Bagdasarova N.A., Ibrayeva G.K., et al. Transformations of the Political Imaginary in Post-Soviet Central Asia: The Cases of Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan // Sociology of Power. 2023. Vol. 35, no. 1. P. 160–189. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2023-1-160-189

Коды статьи

  • EDN PBYBPZ
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)