Strategies of Mobility and Networks of Trust: Analysis of Contemporary Tendencies

Authors

  • Polina Zhigareva Московский институт социально-культурных программ , Moscow Institute of sociocultural programs Автор

Keywords:

social topology, actor-network theory, migration, mobility, choice of strategy, strong ties, weak ties, social capital, trust networks, physical space, social space

Abstract

The article deals with the relation of migration strategies to characteristics of networks of trust. The classical approach to the study of trust relations in migrant communities ignores the actual physical movement: the migrants are considered as those who are already localized in space - made a decision to move and/or realised it. It is more productive to combine the concepts of mobility and trust using concepts of social topology (J. Law). It allows to consider moving in physical space as a movement in space of networks. The theoretical resource of social topology allows to put the question of how the parameters of the weak and strong ties influence the migration attitudes. The author offers two hypotheses. The first, the greater the volume of social capital of the individual, the less likely he or she to move because of the greater local «rootedness». The second: a higher number of strong and weak ties activates migration attitudes. The hypotheses were tested on empirical data of all-Russian sociological research «Eurobarometer in Russia». The analysis showed that the second assumption is true and there is a number of reasons for that. A large number of weak ties is a resource that stimulates short-term economic strategies without reference to the place of residence. This type of connection is not directly related to the level of interpersonal trust, which is likely derived from the intensity of communication. People with a wide circle of contacts, who do not trust others, are more prone to internal migration. Developed strong ties also increase migration mood, but in correlation with long-term economic decisions. In particular, individuals with a lot of strong ties are more likely to choose the external migration. The catalyst for such decisions is primarily the expressed distrust to government institutions, which, as analysis demonstrates, can be bound to high interpersonal trust.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Бурдье П. (2002) Формы капитала. Экономическая Социология. 3 (5)

Валитов В. Н. (2000) Социальные сети российских иммигрантов и коренных жителей. Социологический журнал. 1-2

Вахштайн В. С. (2014) Пересборка города: между языком и пространством. Социология власти. (2)

Гарфинкель Г. (2009) Концепция и экспериментальные исследования «доверия» как условия стабильных согласованных действий. Социологическое обозрение. 8 (1)

Грановеттер М. (2009) Сила слабых связей. Экономическая социология. 10 (4).

Ло Дж. (2006) Объекты и пространства. Социологическое обозрение. 5 (1).

Паченков О. В. (2008) Роль «этнической идентичности» в исследованиях миграции и ответственность социального ученого. Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 11 (1)

Урри Дж. (2012) Мобильности. М.: Праксис

Фирсов Е. Ю. (2008) Исследуя гетерогенную диаспору (на примере армянпереселенцев в российской провинции. Вестник Евразии. 3

Чурсина Ю. А. (2014) «Уехать от» vs «Уехать для». Качество городской среды как фактор миграционных установок населения. Социология власти. (2). Bachmann R. (2001) Trust, Power and Control in Trans-organizational Relations. Organization Studies. 22 (2)

Coleman J. (1988) Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. The American Journal of Sociology. 94

Dei Ottati G. (1984) Trust, Interlinking Transactions and Credit in the Industrial Districts. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 18

Gans H. (1962) The Urban Villagers. N. Y.: Free Press

Harary F., Norman R., Cartwright D. (1965) Structural Models. N. Y.: Wiley

Katz E., Lazarsfeld P. (1955) Personal Influence. N. Y.: Free Press

Malakhov V. S. (2011) Immigration Regimes in Western States and in Russia: Theoretical and Political Aspects. Social Sciences. 42 (1)

Rogers E. (1962) Diffusion of Innovations. N. Y.: Free Press

Siu-lun W., Salaff J. W. (1998) Network capital: emigration from Hong-Kong. British journal of sociology. 49 (3)

Vakhshtayn V., Bardina S., Stepantsov P. (2015) Russian Optimism in a Time of Crisis. Russia Direct Report: Decoding Social Transformations in Russia. Доступ через http://www. russia-direct.org/archive/russia-direct-report-decoding-social-transformations-russia Wirth L. (1998) The Ghetto. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers

World Value Survey (2012) http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs. jsp

Малахов В. С. (2007) Понаехали тут: очерки о национализме, расизме и культурном плюрализме. М.: Новое литературное обозрение

Латур Б. (2007) Об интеробъективности. Социологическое обозрение. 6 (2)

Downloads

Published

2015-07-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhigareva P. Strategies of Mobility and Networks of Trust: Analysis of Contemporary Tendencies // Sociology of Power. 2015. Vol. 27, no. 4. P. 177–194.

Коды статьи

  • EDN VLEZBH
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)