Logics of health care and embodied trust in medical encounters

Authors

  • Ekaterina A. Borozdina Европейский университет в Санкт-Петербурге , European University at St. Petersburg Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2017-3-82-102

Keywords:

maternity care, natural childbirth, care, trust

Abstract

The article analyzes different logics of organization of medical care in Russian obstetrics. The attention is focused on trust relationship between healthcare professionals and a mother to be, and particularly, on the bodily dimension of such trust. Many researchers note the crisis of institutional trust in Russian medicine. Within the frame of neo-liberal logic, i.e. the logic of choice, citizen-consumers (usually, from highly educated and wealthy background) address this crisis by the purchasing personalized attention of the medical professional. Within the logic of care, which is associated with the "natural" approach to childbirth, trust becomes embodied. Careful preparation for the birth of a child gains special importance. To ensure that a woman will be able to "give birth by herself" (without undue intervention), the midwife and the expectant mother accomplish serious extensive work preparing her body for labour. The other component of the 83 trust relationship is the practical trust between a client and her individual midwife. As a result of a prolonged (during several months) interaction, the midwife and her client get to know how each of them behaves in different situations. Thus, in addition to the ideological aspect, the "natural child-birth" model incorporates practical differences from the purely medical model, which is prevalent in Russia. Delivery in these two cases is produced in different ways. The paper relies on the works of the Netherland philosopher Annemarie Mol. Empirical basis is constituted by interviews with medical personnel and mothers from four Russian maternity hospitals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Аронсон П. (2006) Утрата институционального доверия в российском здравоохранении. Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, (2): 120-131.

Бороздина Е. (2014) Социальная организация естественных родов (случай центра акушерского ухода). Журнал исследований социальной политики, 12 (3): 413-428.

Здравомыслова Е., Тёмкина A. (2009) «Врачам я не доверяю, но...» Преодоление недоверия к репродуктивной медицине. Е. Здравомыслова, А. Тёмкина (ред.) Здоровье и доверие: гендерный подход к репродуктивной медицине, СПб.: Издательство ЕУСПб: 179-210.

Мельникова О. (2014) Медицинская помощь во время родов: забота и обезболивающие технологии. Журнал исследований социальной политики, 12 (3): 327-352.

Тёмкина А. (2014) Медикализация репродукции и родов: борьба за контроль. Журнал исследований социальной политики, 12 (3): 321-336.

Тёмкина А. (2016) Оплачиваемая забота и безопасность: что продается и покупается в родильных домах? Социология власти, (1): 76-106.

Тёмкина А. (2017) «Экономика доверия» в платном сегменте родовспоможения: городская образованная женщина как потребитель и пациентка. Экономическая социология, 18 (3): 14-47 (https://ecsoc.hse.ru/data/2017/05/31/1172172613/ecsoc_t18_ n3.pdf#page=14).

Akrich M., Pasveer B. (2000) Multiplying Obstetrics: Techniques of Surveillance and Forms of Coordination. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, (21): 63-83.

Annandale E., Clark J. (1996) What is Gender? Feminist Theory and the Sociology of Human Reproduction. Sociology of Health and Illness, 18 (1): 17-44.

Beasley C., Bacchi C. (2007) Envisaging a New Politics for an Ethical Future. Beyond Trust, Care and Generosity towards an Ethic of Social Flesh. Feminist Theory, 8 (3): 279-298.

Beckett K. (2005) Choosing Caesarean: Feminism and the Politics of Childbirth in the United States. Feminist Theory, 6 (3): 251-275.

Brown P., Alaszewski A., Swift T., Nordin A. (2011) Actions Speak Louder than Words: the Embodiment of Trust by Healthcare Professionals in Gynae-Oncology. Sociology of Health and Illness, 33 (2): 280-295.

Cook L.J. (2014) Spontaneous privatization in Russia and Its Political Consequences in Russia's Postcommunist Health Sector. M. Cammett, L. MacLean (eds) The Politics of Non-State Social Welfare, Ithaka and London: Cornell University Press: 217-236.

Craven C. (2007) A "Consumer's Right" to Choose a Midwife: Shifting Meanings for Reproductive Rights under Neoliberalism. American Anthropologist. New Series, 109 (4): 701-712.

Davies C. (1995) Competence versus Care? Gender and Caring Work Revisited. Acta Sociologica, 1 (38): 17-31.

Fox B., Worts D. (1999) Revisiting the Critique of Medicalized Childbirth: A Contribution to the Sociology of Birth. Gender and Society, 13 (3): 326-346.

Graham H., Oakley A. (1979) Competing Ideologies of Reproduction: Medical and Maternal Perspectives on Pregnancy. H. Roberts (ed.) Women and Health Care, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul: 50-74.

Jordan B. (1997) Authoritative Knowledge and Its Construction. R. Davis-Floyd, C.F. Sargent (eds) Childbirth and Authoritative Knowledge: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, Berkeley: University of California Press: 55-79.

Kuhlmann E. (2006) Traces of Doubt and Sources of Trust. Health Professions in an Uncertain Society. Current Sociology, 54 (4): 607-620.

Lupton D. (2016) Precious cargo: foetal subjects, risk and reproductive citizenship. Critical Public Health, 22(3): 329-340.

Macdonald M. (2006) Gender Expectations: Natural Bodies and Natural Births in the New Midwifery in Canada. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 20 (2): 235-256.

Mansfield B. (2008) The Social Nature of Natural Childbirth. Social Science and Medicine, (66): 1084-1094.

McCabe K. (2016) Mothercraft: Birth work and the making of neoliberal mothers. Social Science and Medicine, (162): 177-184

Mechanic D. (1996) Changing Medical Organization and the Erosion of Trust. The Milbank Quarterly, 74 (2): 171-189.

Mol A. (1999) Ontological Politics. A Word and Some Questions. Sociological Review, 47 (S1): 74-89.

Mol A. (2002) The Body Multiple. Ontology in Medical Practice, Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Mol A. (2008) The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice, London: Routledge.

Knijn T., Kremer M. (1993) Gender and the Caring Dimension of Welfare States: Towards Inclusive Citizenship. Social Politics, (3): 328-361.

Kremer M. (2007) How Welfare States Care. Culture, Gender and Parenting in Europe, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Oakley A. (1984) The Captured Womb: A History of the Medical Care of Pregnant Women, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Rivkin-Fish M. (2005) Women's Health in Post-Soviet Russia: The Politics of Intervention, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Viisainen K. (2001) Negotiating Control and Meaning: Home Birth as a Self-Con-100 structed Choice in Finland. Social Science and Medicine, (52): 1109-1121.

Zadoroznyj M. (2001). Birth and the reflexive consumer. Journal of Sociology, 37 (2), 117-139.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Borozdina E.A. Logics of health care and embodied trust in medical encounters // Sociology of Power. 2017. Vol. 29, no. 3. P. 82–102. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-0492-2017-3-82-102

Коды статьи

  • EDN YTPUIZ
  • Тип статьи (РИНЦ) Научная статья (Научная статья)